Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Pilão Arcado fire, 9 October 2022 Pilão Arcado

Out · last detection 19 Oct 2022, 15:54 UTC

The fire started on 9 October 2022 in Pilão Arcado, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,502 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 231th largest in Bahia since 2016 (of 386 with a page). Number 344 in Brazil in 2022, of 682.

Burnt area
4,502ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
11days
9 Oct 2022 – 19 Oct 2022
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
9 Oct
2022
Heat detections
163
in a single hotspot: 151 MW
Danger at start
52
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
359MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 9 Oct19 Oct
19 Oct 2022

How it evolved, day by day

9 Oct 2022 · 85 MW · 2 10 Oct 2022 · 331 MW · 22 11 Oct 2022 · 1,728 MW · 52 12 Oct 2022 · 259 MW · 18 13 Oct 2022 · 399 MW · 7 14 Oct 2022 · 412 MW · 18 15 Oct 2022 · 289 MW · 22 16 Oct 2022 · 146 MW · 7 17 Oct 2022 · 284 MW · 11 18 Oct 2022 · 2 MW · 2 19 Oct 2022 · 17 MW · 2
11 Oct 15 Oct 18 Oct

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
50km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity

It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 6.4 mm on 25 Oct.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.8% of the area of London (45 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Pilão Arcado 35,357 inhabitants where it started
    4,528 ha reached on 9 Oct
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Oct 38.4 °C 17 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
6 Oct 37.0 °C 17 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 59
7 Oct 37.1 °C 22 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
8 Oct 37.6 °C 21 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
9 Oct 37.7 °C 14 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
10 Oct 35.0 °C 18 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
11 Oct 36.3 °C 17 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
12 Oct 35.3 °C 21 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
13 Oct 36.1 °C 18 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
14 Oct 36.9 °C 20 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
15 Oct 36.5 °C 22 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
16 Oct 35.7 °C 21 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
17 Oct 36.5 °C 16 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
18 Oct 36.7 °C 18 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
19 Oct 36.6 °C 19 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
20 Oct after 36.7 °C 18 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
21 Oct after 37.3 °C 19 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
22 Oct after 36.1 °C 24 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
23 Oct after 35.5 °C 29 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
24 Oct after 35.3 °C 32 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
25 Oct after 30.8 °C 50 % 37 km/h 6.4 mm Low 7

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 52.4, a minimum humidity of 14% and 9 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 18.

FWI at the start 52.4
Minimum humidity 14 %
Days without rain 9
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Cristalândia do Piauí fire, September 2021
3,588 ha 15 days FWI 50.0 Min. humidity 14 % 215 km away, in 2021

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

11 days
median duration
3,718 ha
median area
0 %
went past 10,000 ha
4.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 10 of 18 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (4,502 ha against a median of 3,718 ha) and lasted 11 days, against 11 days.

In 8 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

6.4 mmfirst rain
25 Oct6 days after it ended
50km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 19 Oct, and on 25 Oct 6.4 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 10 of 18, with a median of 4.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 2 Oct 2022
After · 26 Oct 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 19 October 2022 the air beside the fire reached 105 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 19: 1.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak105 µg/m³
Days over the guideline2 days
PM10150 µg/m³
Optical depth2.42
7 Oct11 Oct15 Oct19 Oct
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 163Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Pilão Arcado fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 October 2022 and 19 October 2022: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,502 hectares (45.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Pilão Arcado (4,528 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.4 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 50 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 62, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 18. Their median duration was 11 days and their median area 3,718 ha; 0 % went past 10,000 ha. In 8 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 163 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.