Oiapoque fire, September 2023 Oiapoque
The fire started on 27 September 2023 in Oiapoque, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 24 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 9,002 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 6th largest in Amapá since 2016 (of 41 with a page). Number 61 in Brazil in 2023, of 431.
- Burnt area
- 9,002ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 24days
- 27 Sept 2023 – 20 Oct 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 27 Sept
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 379
- in a single hotspot: 31 MW
- Danger at start
- 16
- Moderate · FWI index
- Energy released
- 2.2GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.1 mm on 22 Oct.
This area had burned before
74% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 6,001 ha in 2016, 1,341 ha in 2018, 1,060 ha in 2019, 2,556 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 6,676 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
9,064 ha reached on 21 Sept0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept | 32.8 °C | 57 % | 40 km/h | 0.4 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 22 Sept | 32.6 °C | 58 % | 42 km/h | 3.7 mm | Low 5 |
| 23 Sept | 34.0 °C | 51 % | 31 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 24 Sept | 34.3 °C | 51 % | 32 km/h | 0.3 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 25 Sept | 33.7 °C | 53 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 26 Sept | 33.6 °C | 49 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 27 Sept | 34.0 °C | 47 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 28 Sept | 32.8 °C | 57 % | 41 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 29 Sept | 33.1 °C | 51 % | 40 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 21 |
| 30 Sept | 33.8 °C | 52 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 1 Oct | 32.9 °C | 53 % | 39 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 2 Oct | 33.0 °C | 57 % | 44 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 21 |
| 3 Oct | 32.9 °C | 62 % | 45 km/h | 1.3 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 4 Oct | 33.4 °C | 56 % | 41 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 5 Oct | 33.6 °C | 51 % | 38 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 6 Oct | 33.4 °C | 53 % | 37 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 7 Oct | 33.4 °C | 51 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 8 Oct | 33.7 °C | 47 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 9 Oct | 32.9 °C | 50 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 10 Oct | 32.8 °C | 53 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 11 Oct | 33.3 °C | 48 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 12 Oct | 33.5 °C | 49 % | 33 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 22 |
| 13 Oct | 34.2 °C | 46 % | 37 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 24 |
| 14 Oct | 33.6 °C | 50 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 15 Oct | 34.4 °C | 42 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 16 Oct | 33.0 °C | 60 % | 34 km/h | 2.5 mm | Low 7 |
| 17 Oct | 34.6 °C | 48 % | 34 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 18 Oct | 32.0 °C | 62 % | 37 km/h | 10.2 mm | Very low 3 |
| 19 Oct | 32.2 °C | 65 % | 38 km/h | 3.3 mm | Very low 3 |
| 20 Oct | 33.1 °C | 55 % | 39 km/h | 1.3 mm | Low 6 |
| 21 Oct after | 34.6 °C | 50 % | 32 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 22 Oct after | 33.6 °C | 62 % | 38 km/h | 2.1 mm | Low 6 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 21 October 2023 the air beside the fire reached 18 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 17: 1.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 379Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 5,352 haOiapoque23 October 2024 · 10 days · 1 km away
- 3,225 haOiapoqueNovember 2025 · 9 days · 6 km away
- 9,670 haCalçoene1 November 2023 · 22 days · 15 km away
- 12,633 haCalçoene28 October 2023 · 23 days · 19 km away
- 3,541 haOiapoque 14 October 2026 · 7 days · 19 km away
- 3,112 haOiapoque25 October 2024 · 6 days · 20 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Oiapoque fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 September 2023 and 20 October 2023: 24 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 9,002 hectares (90.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Oiapoque (9,064 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.6 °C, humidity dropped to 42 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 26, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.