Skip to content
worldfires
SD · Sudan · –

Keilak fire, 13 November 2020 Keilak

Out · last detection 18 Nov 2020, 11:19 UTC

The fire started on 13 November 2020 in Keilak, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,134 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 29th largest in West Kordofan since 2016 (of 101 with a page). Number 51 in Sudan in 2020, of 151.

Compare with…
Burnt area
3,134ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
13 Nov 2020 – 18 Nov 2020
Municipalities hit
1
localities
Started on
13 Nov
2020
Heat detections
94
in a single hotspot: 103 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
290MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 13 Nov18 Nov
18 Nov 2020

How it evolved, day by day

13 Nov 2020 · 128 MW · 2 14 Nov 2020 · 124 MW · 19 15 Nov 2020 · 416 MW · 22 16 Nov 2020 · 982 MW · 36 17 Nov 2020 · 81 MW · 14 18 Nov 2020 · 6 MW · 1
13 Nov 16 Nov

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
38km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity

It had gone 12 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

93% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,972 ha in 2016, 1,573 ha in 2017, 522 ha in 2018, 337 ha in 2019. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,916 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2% of the area of London (31 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Keilak where it started
    3,150 ha reached on 13 Nov
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
13 Nov 36.8 °C 20 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
14 Nov 36.3 °C 17 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
15 Nov 36.1 °C 17 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
16 Nov 35.6 °C 18 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
17 Nov 36.9 °C 18 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
18 Nov 37.4 °C 18 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
19 Nov after 36.9 °C 18 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
20 Nov after 36.7 °C 17 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
21 Nov after 36.9 °C 14 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
22 Nov after 36.7 °C 13 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
23 Nov after 36.6 °C 16 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
24 Nov after 37.6 °C 17 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
25 Nov after 37.8 °C 15 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
26 Nov after 37.3 °C 15 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
27 Nov after 37.5 °C 13 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
28 Nov after 37.0 °C 12 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 46.4, a minimum humidity of 20% and 12 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 26.

FWI at the start 46.4
Minimum humidity 20 %
Days without rain 12
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Koch fire, May 2023
5,967 ha 15 days FWI 44.5 Min. humidity 19 % 199 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 7.2 mm on 29 May.

What happened to them

5 days
median duration
2,656 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 3 of 26 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (3,134 ha against a median of 2,656 ha) and lasted 6 days, against 5 days.

In 23 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
38km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 18 Nov, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 3 of 26, with a median of 1.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 6 Nov 2020
After · 25 Nov 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 94Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Keilak fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 13 November 2020 to 18 November 2020 (6 days). The perimeter dates it from 14 November 2020 to 18 November 2020.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,134 hectares (31.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Keilak (3,150 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.4 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 26. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 2,656 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 23 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 14 November 2020 → 13 November 2020.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 14 November 2020 to 18 November 2020. 94 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.