Keilak fire, 4 November 2016 Keilak
The fire started on 4 November 2016 in Keilak, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 15,871 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 2th largest in West Kordofan since 2016 (of 175 with a page). Number 4 in Sudan in 2016, of 169.
- Burnt area
- 15,871ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 6days
- 4 Nov 2016 – 9 Nov 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- localities
- Started on
- 4 Nov
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 488
- in a single hotspot: 100 MW
- Danger at start
- 38
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 4.6GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 13 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
Keilak where it started15,952 ha reached on 2 Nov1.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov | 39.1 °C | 14 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 5 Nov | 39.1 °C | 14 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 6 Nov | 39.0 °C | 14 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 7 Nov | 38.7 °C | 14 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 8 Nov | 38.4 °C | 15 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 9 Nov | 38.7 °C | 14 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 10 Nov after | 38.9 °C | 15 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 11 Nov after | 39.9 °C | 10 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 12 Nov after | 39.9 °C | 12 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 13 Nov after | 39.5 °C | 13 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 14 Nov after | 40.0 °C | 13 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 15 Nov after | 40.9 °C | 10 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 16 Nov after | 40.6 °C | 9 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 17 Nov after | 39.2 °C | 11 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 18 Nov after | 38.9 °C | 15 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 19 Nov after | 39.5 °C | 14 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 488Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 5,650 haKeilak8 November 2017 · 5 days · 4 km away
- 7,276 haKeilak22 November 2021 · 5 days · 5 km away
- 6,009 haKeilakJanuary 2017 · 13 days · 11 km away
- 5,405 haKeilak28 November 2025 · 16 days · 18 km away
- 6,155 haKeilak 15 October 2026 · 9 days · 29 km away
- 12,100 haKeilak5 November 2017 · 8 days · 31 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Keilak fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 4 November 2016 and 9 November 2016: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 15,871 hectares (158.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Keilak (15,952 ha, 1.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 39.1 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 32 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.