Keilak fire, January 2017 Keilak
The fire started on 2 January 2017 in Keilak, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,009 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 12th largest in West Kordofan since 2016 (of 175 with a page). Number 15 in Sudan in 2017, of 137.
- Burnt area
- 6,009ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 13days
- 2 Jan 2017 – 14 Jan 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- localities
- Started on
- 2 Jan
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 202
- in a single hotspot: 59 MW
- Danger at start
- 65
- Extreme · FWI index
- Energy released
- 1.4GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
2% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 136 ha in 2016.
What happened to each town
-
Keilak where it started6,043 ha reached on 2 Jan0.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Jan | 37.5 °C | 13 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 3 Jan | 37.3 °C | 12 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 4 Jan | 36.2 °C | 11 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 5 Jan | 37.2 °C | 11 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 6 Jan | 38.6 °C | 11 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 7 Jan | 39.3 °C | 8 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 8 Jan | 38.8 °C | 7 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 68 |
| 9 Jan | 36.8 °C | 7 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 68 |
| 10 Jan | 37.5 °C | 6 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 11 Jan | 38.7 °C | 12 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 12 Jan | 39.9 °C | 8 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 72 |
| 13 Jan | 39.3 °C | 6 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 14 Jan | 39.6 °C | 7 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 15 Jan after | 40.5 °C | 7 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 16 Jan after | 40.5 °C | 6 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 17 Jan after | 40.7 °C | 6 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 70 |
| 18 Jan after | 41.0 °C | 8 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 19 Jan after | 40.8 °C | 7 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 72 |
| 20 Jan after | 40.1 °C | 8 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 68 |
| 21 Jan after | 40.0 °C | 9 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 72 |
| 22 Jan after | 40.3 °C | 11 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 76 |
| 23 Jan after | 40.3 °C | 11 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 76 |
| 24 Jan after | 40.4 °C | 10 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 75 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 202Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 5,650 haKeilak8 November 2017 · 5 days · 9 km away
- 15,871 haKeilak4 November 2016 · 6 days · 11 km away
- 7,276 haKeilak22 November 2021 · 5 days · 14 km away
- 12,100 haKeilak5 November 2017 · 8 days · 21 km away
- 6,155 haKeilak 15 October 2026 · 9 days · 23 km away
- 5,405 haKeilak28 November 2025 · 16 days · 28 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Keilak fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 2 January 2017 and 14 January 2017: 13 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,009 hectares (60.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Keilak (6,043 ha, 0.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 39.9 °C, humidity dropped to 6 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 72, class Very extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.