Hostotipaquillo fire, March 2017 Ixtlán del Río, Magdalena, San Marcos
The fire started on 27 March 2017 in Hostotipaquillo, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 25,730 hectares from heat detections, spread across 6 municipalities.
It is the 2th largest in Jalisco since 2016 (of 283 with a page). Number 2 in Mexico in 2017, of 375.
- Burnt area
- 25,730ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 26days
- 27 Mar 2017 – 21 Apr 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 6
- municipalities
- Started on
- 27 Mar
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 1,528
- in a single hotspot: 112 MW
- Danger at start
- 44
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 10.1GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 14 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
8,497 ha reached on 28 Mar17 %
-
6,187 ha reached on 29 Mar21 %
-
5,614 ha reached on 2 Apr18 %
-
Hostotipaquillo where it started3,004 ha reached on 27 Mar4.0 %
-
2,455 ha reached on 14 Apr4.7 %
-
100 ha0.3 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
Official record
According to CONAFOR, this fire started on 27 March 2017 and burned 15,906 ha (the satellite measured 25,730 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
- Hostotipaquillo La Mora 27 March 2017 15,906 ha · extinguished on 10 April 2017 · cause: unknown
CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal), estadística de incendios forestales en datos.gob.mx (CC BY 4.0). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Mar | 29.5 °C | 7 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 28 Mar | 28.7 °C | 5 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 29 Mar | 27.3 °C | 7 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 30 Mar | 28.7 °C | 6 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 31 Mar | 27.7 °C | 10 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 1 Apr | 27.9 °C | 8 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 2 Apr | 26.3 °C | 14 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 3 Apr | 30.0 °C | 6 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 4 Apr | 29.0 °C | 7 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 5 Apr | 31.6 °C | 9 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 6 Apr | 32.1 °C | 12 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 7 Apr | 30.7 °C | 10 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 8 Apr | 31.6 °C | 6 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 9 Apr | 31.3 °C | 9 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 10 Apr | 31.5 °C | 7 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 11 Apr | 30.9 °C | 9 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 12 Apr | 31.0 °C | 11 % | 54 km/h | 0.2 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 13 Apr | 30.3 °C | 10 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 14 Apr | 30.0 °C | 11 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 15 Apr | 29.8 °C | 11 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 16 Apr | 29.4 °C | 13 % | 57 km/h | 0.7 mm | Very high 48 |
| 17 Apr | 27.5 °C | 12 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 18 Apr | 29.0 °C | 7 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 19 Apr | 30.2 °C | 10 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 20 Apr | 31.1 °C | 8 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 21 Apr | 29.8 °C | 14 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 22 Apr after | 31.3 °C | 13 % | 47 km/h | 0.6 mm | Very high 48 |
| 23 Apr after | 31.1 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.6 mm | Very high 41 |
| 24 Apr after | 28.3 °C | 21 % | 46 km/h | 0.3 mm | Very high 43 |
| 25 Apr after | 28.1 °C | 13 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 26 Apr after | 27.7 °C | 7 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 27 Apr after | 29.2 °C | 4 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 28 Apr after | 28.6 °C | 5 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 29 Apr after | 29.2 °C | 8 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 30 Apr after | 30.4 °C | 9 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 1 May after | 31.5 °C | 9 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 1,528Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Hostotipaquillo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 March 2017 and 21 April 2017: 26 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 25,730 hectares (257.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 6 municipalities: Ixtlán del Río (8,497 ha, 17 %); Magdalena (6,187 ha, 21 %); San Marcos (5,614 ha, 18 %); Hostotipaquillo (3,004 ha, 4.0 %); Amatlán de Cañas (2,455 ha, 4.7 %); Etzatlán (100 ha, 0.3 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 32.1 °C, humidity dropped to 5 % and gusts hit 57 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 59, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.