Skip to content
worldfires
HR · Croatia · –

Grad Vrlika fire, April 2020 Grad Vrlika, Općina Ružić, Općina Muć

Out · last detection 13 Apr 2020, 01:50 UTC

The fire started on 8 April 2020 in Grad Vrlika, Croatia, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 3,636 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 4 municipalities.

It is the 3th largest in Split-Dalmatia since 2016 (of 48 with a page). Number 3 in Croatia in 2020, of 32.

Burnt area
3,636ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
6days
8 Apr 2020 – 13 Apr 2020
Municipalities hit
4
municipalities
Started on
8 Apr
2020
Heat detections
180
in a single hotspot: 68 MW
Danger at start
14
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
137MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 8 Apr13 Apr
13 Apr 2020

How it evolved, day by day

8 Apr 2020 · 347 MW · 52 9 Apr 2020 · 148 MW · 30 10 Apr 2020 · 179 MW · 52 11 Apr 2020 · 31 MW · 17 12 Apr 2020 · 99 MW · 20 13 Apr 2020 · 19 MW · 9
8 Apr 10 Apr 12 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

20°high
44km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity

It had gone 7 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 16.5 mm on 14 Apr.

This area had burned before

25% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 896 ha in 2017.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.3% of the area of London (36 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Grad Vrlika where it started
    2,059 ha reached on 8 Apr
    8.5 %
  2. 1,275 ha reached on 8 Apr
    7.7 %
  3. 226 ha reached on 11 Apr
    1.0 %
  4. 76 ha reached on 10 Apr
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland36 %
  • Other natural land33 %
  • Broadleaved forest30 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
8 Apr 15.8 °C 20 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
9 Apr 17.8 °C 26 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
10 Apr 20.0 °C 21 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
11 Apr 19.1 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
12 Apr 18.7 °C 22 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
13 Apr 15.9 °C 45 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
14 Apr after 9.8 °C 57 % 64 km/h 16.5 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 13.5, a minimum humidity of 20% and 7 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 41.

FWI at the start 13.5
Minimum humidity 20 %
Days without rain 7
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Općina Lovinac fire, March 2022
725 ha 2 days FWI 12.1 Min. humidity 20 % 94 km away, in 2022

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.6 mm on 30 Mar.

What happened to them

3 days
median duration
178 ha
median area
15 %
went past 1,000 ha
7.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 41 of 41 had it)

It was 20.4 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 6 days, against 3 days.

Only 1 of its 41 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 7.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

16.5 mmfirst rain
14 Aprthe day after it ended
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 13 Apr, and on 14 Apr 16.5 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 41 of 41, with a median of 7.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 1 Apr 2020
After · 20 Apr 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 10 April 2020 the air beside the fire reached 38 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 26: 1.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak38 µg/m³
Days over the guideline4 days
PM1044 µg/m³
6 Apr9 Apr12 Apr15 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 180Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Croatia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Grad Vrlika fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 8 April 2020 and 13 April 2020: 6 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 3,636 hectares (36.4 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 4 municipalities: Grad Vrlika (2,059 ha, 8.5 %); Općina Ružić (1,275 ha, 7.7 %); Općina Muć (226 ha, 1.0 %); Općina Hrvace (76 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 20.0 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 19, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Croatia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 41. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 178 ha; 15 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 1 of its 41 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 7.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112 · 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 180 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.