Coyuca de Catalán fire, 1 April 2023
Coyuca de Catalán
Out · last detection 22 Apr 2023, 08:47 UTC
The fire started on 1 April 2023 in Coyuca de Catalán, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 22 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 9,894 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality. According to CONAFOR, it was detected on 1 April 2023 and declared extinguished on 24 April 2023.
It is the 33th largest in Guerrero since 2016 (of 582 with a page). Number 10 in Mexico in 2023, of 285.
The power measured by the satellite is low (24.5 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings ›
Weather during the fire
model
35.7°C · 13% RH
High of 35.7 °C and minimum humidity of 13% on 16 April 2023; gusts of 39 km/h on 13 April 2023.
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
ⓘThis page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
· reconstructedofficial
Matched with the official CONAFOR record
Matches: 12,038 ha in the official record (records: 1).
A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
36°high
39km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity
It had gone 16 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
97% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,066 ha in 2016, 4,121 ha in 2017, 901 ha in 2018, 3,239 ha in 2019, 4,804 ha in 2020, 7,160 ha in 2021, 2,044 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 9,570 ha that had burned before.
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Day
High
Min. humidity
Peak gust
Rain
Danger (FWI)
1 Apr
35.0 °C
19 %
34 km/h
0.0 mm
High 34
2 Apr
35.2 °C
20 %
34 km/h
0.0 mm
High 35
3 Apr
35.5 °C
18 %
37 km/h
0.0 mm
High 36
4 Apr
33.6 °C
26 %
36 km/h
0.0 mm
High 35
5 Apr
33.7 °C
26 %
37 km/h
0.0 mm
High 34
6 Apr
32.9 °C
37 %
34 km/h
0.0 mm
High 28
7 Apr
34.3 °C
27 %
36 km/h
0.0 mm
High 30
8 Apr
33.9 °C
27 %
35 km/h
0.0 mm
High 33
9 Apr
33.9 °C
27 %
35 km/h
0.1 mm
High 34
10 Apr
33.8 °C
27 %
34 km/h
0.2 mm
High 34
11 Apr
33.4 °C
24 %
29 km/h
0.2 mm
High 34
12 Apr
33.3 °C
26 %
30 km/h
1.4 mm
High 34
13 Apr
33.1 °C
20 %
39 km/h
0.2 mm
High 30
14 Apr
34.3 °C
15 %
38 km/h
0.0 mm
Very high 40
15 Apr
34.8 °C
13 %
35 km/h
0.0 mm
Very high 48
16 Apr
35.7 °C
13 %
33 km/h
0.2 mm
Very high 48
17 Apr
32.6 °C
26 %
35 km/h
0.0 mm
High 36
18 Apr
32.5 °C
28 %
35 km/h
0.2 mm
High 36
19 Apr
34.1 °C
21 %
37 km/h
0.0 mm
High 37
20 Apr
34.6 °C
22 %
37 km/h
0.1 mm
High 36
21 Apr
35.6 °C
21 %
34 km/h
0.4 mm
High 37
22 Apr
33.5 °C
29 %
34 km/h
2.1 mm
High 36
23 Apr after
33.4 °C
29 %
32 km/h
0.5 mm
Moderate 17
24 Apr after
33.0 °C
30 %
31 km/h
0.4 mm
High 27
25 Apr after
33.9 °C
23 %
37 km/h
0.1 mm
High 32
26 Apr after
34.4 °C
21 %
38 km/h
0.1 mm
High 35
27 Apr after
33.6 °C
20 %
38 km/h
0.0 mm
High 37
28 Apr after
33.9 °C
20 %
35 km/h
0.0 mm
High 38
29 Apr after
34.3 °C
19 %
36 km/h
0.0 mm
Very high 39
30 Apr after
32.5 °C
27 %
35 km/h
0.2 mm
High 36
1 May after
33.3 °C
25 %
38 km/h
0.0 mm
High 36
2 May after
33.7 °C
24 %
36 km/h
0.0 mm
Very high 38
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 34.4, a minimum humidity of 19% and 16 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 28.
FWI at the start34.4
Minimum humidity19 %
Days without rain16
this firechosen twinsrest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Coyuca de Catalán fire, 1 April 2023
9,894 ha22 daysFWI 34.4Min. humidity 19 %
Copalillo fire, March 2016
2,916 ha8 daysFWI 33.9Min. humidity 19 %175 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
It was 2.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 22 days, against 15 days.
Only 3 of its 28 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 8 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.1 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
39km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 22 Apr, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 20 of 28, with a median of 2.1 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 25 Mar 2023
After · 29 Apr 2023
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · Copernicus
On 18 April 2023 the air beside the fire reached 32 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 23: 1.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak32µg/m³
Days over the guideline6days
PM1046µg/m³
Optical depth0.82
WHO 15
30 Mar4 Apr9 Apr14 Apr19 Apr
GoodFairModeratePoorVery poorExtremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table· 405Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.›
⬇ Download CSVTimes in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 1 April 2023 to 22 April 2023 (22 days). The perimeter dates it from 1 April 2023 to 20 April 2023. According to CONAFOR, it was detected on 1 April 2023 and declared extinguished on 24 April 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 9,894 hectares (98.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Coyuca de Catalán (10,045 ha, 3.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.7 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 39 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 28. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 3,560 ha; 11 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 3 of its 28 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 8 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.1 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
⚑Report an errorHow we know this›
Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 1 April 2023 to 20 April 2023. 405 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
Compared with CONAFOR: 12,038 official ha against 9,894 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.