Burned area
satellite only7,635ha
Union of 2 GWIS (Copernicus) perimeters: overlapping areas count once.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 9 Apr 2017 – 4 May 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
MX · Mexico · –
Chilpancingo de los Bravo fire, 9 April 2017 Chilpancingo de los Bravo, Leonardo Bravo
Out · last detection 4 May 2017, 19:11 UTC
The fire started on 9 April 2017 in Chilpancingo de los Bravo, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,635 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 49th largest in Guerrero since 2016 (of 582 with a page). Number 34 in Mexico in 2017, of 374.
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-11-05matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only26days
9 Apr 2017 to 4 May 2017: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 4 May 2017, 19:11 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only9 Apr 2017
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 9 Apr 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only337
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 31 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 9 Apr 2017 – 4 May 2017
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only257MW
Total radiative power on 25 April 2017; hotspots that day: 43.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 25 Apr 2017
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model27.1FWI · high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 11.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 9 Apr 2017, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model33.0°C · 35% RH
High of 33.0 °C and minimum humidity of 35% on 30 April 2017; gusts of 48 km/h on 2 May 2017.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 9 Apr 2017 – 4 May 2017
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logArea: 8,093 → 7,635 ha.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 5 November 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 7,635 ha
- Dates
- 9 Apr 2017 – 4 May 2017
- Name
- Chilpancingo de los Bravo
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/chilpancingo-de-los-bravo-2017-04?v=2026-11-05A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire chilpancingo-de-los-bravo-2017-04.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-09 | 1 | 1 | 30.5 | 17.1 | 35 | 8.6 | 38.9 | 0.5 | 27.1 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-10 | 15 | 77 | 30.6 | 17 | 33 | 9.7 | 42.1 | 0.2 | 27.5 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-11 | 13 | 20 | 32.5 | 16.6 | 27 | 8.7 | 35.3 | 0 | 22.3 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-12 | 44 | 167 | 31.3 | 16.4 | 29 | 9.1 | 37.8 | 0.2 | 26 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-13 | 40 | 186 | 29.9 | 15.6 | 29 | 6.4 | 34.9 | 0.2 | 25.3 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-14 | 19 | 168 | 29.8 | 17 | 36 | 5.2 | 28.4 | 0 | 25.1 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-15 | 5 | 28 | 29.6 | 17.4 | 33 | 9.7 | 33.5 | 0.2 | 25.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-16 | 5 | 8 | 30 | 17.9 | 34 | 8.7 | 36.7 | 5.4 | 26.9 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-17 | 18 | 44 | 29.2 | 16 | 35 | 8 | 34.9 | 11.4 | 4.2 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2017-04-18 | 0 | 0 | 27.3 | 14.9 | 40 | 8.4 | 42.8 | 4.7 | 1.4 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2017-04-19 | 2 | 2 | 28.4 | 14.1 | 31 | 7.6 | 35.6 | 5.3 | 3.9 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2017-04-20 | 7 | 30 | 29.2 | 13.8 | 30 | 11.3 | 43.6 | 0.6 | 2 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2017-04-21 | 8 | 90 | 29.4 | 15.2 | 33 | 7.6 | 35.6 | 0 | 11.6 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-22 | 20 | 113 | 30.3 | 14.6 | 32 | 9.7 | 37.1 | 0 | 16.5 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-23 | 28 | 31 | 29.9 | 15.3 | 32 | 11.6 | 44.6 | 0.2 | 19.7 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-24 | 13 | 24 | 28.8 | 15.6 | 43 | 11.4 | 45 | 0.5 | 21.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-25 | 43 | 257 | 29.6 | 16.2 | 34 | 9.8 | 39.6 | 0.1 | 21.2 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-26 | 18 | 95 | 29.7 | 18 | 39 | 9.4 | 37.1 | 0 | 21.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-27 | 6 | 8 | 29.3 | 16.5 | 49 | 9.7 | 38.9 | 0.6 | 19.1 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-28 | 10 | 77 | 31.2 | 17.4 | 36 | 7.6 | 29.9 | 0.2 | 18 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-04-29 | 3 | 39 | 29 | 18.5 | 44 | 9.7 | 38.2 | 0 | 22.1 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-04-30 | 2 | 16 | 33 | 16.7 | 35 | 7.6 | 37.1 | 0.9 | 20.4 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-05-01 | 5 | 26 | 32.1 | 17.4 | 36 | 10.1 | 41.8 | 0.3 | 21.3 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-05-02 | 5 | 21 | 31.1 | 17.8 | 40 | 10.8 | 47.5 | 1.1 | 24.5 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-05-03 | 4 | 20 | 30.5 | 18.3 | 42 | 9 | 37.8 | 2.3 | 18.5 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-05-04 | 3 | 17 | 31 | 18 | 41 | 7 | 34.6 | 7.1 | 8.2 | bajo | 1 |
| 2017-05-05 | 0 | 0 | 27.3 | 18.2 | 59 | 8.3 | 36 | 15 | 2 | muy_bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 7,635ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 26days
- 9 Apr 2017 – 4 May 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 9 Apr
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 337
- in a single hotspot: 31 MW
- Danger at start
- 27
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 63MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
9 Apr4 May
4 May 2017
How it evolved, day by day
9 Apr
14 Apr
20 Apr
25 Apr
30 Apr
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
33°high
48km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity
It had gone 11 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 15.0 mm on 5 May.
This area had burned before
9% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 652 ha in 2016.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
6,929 ha reached on 9 Apr3.2 %
-
1,209 ha reached on 13 Apr1.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr | 30.5 °C | 35 % | 39 km/h | 0.5 mm | High 27 |
| 10 Apr | 30.6 °C | 33 % | 42 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 28 |
| 11 Apr | 32.5 °C | 27 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 12 Apr | 31.3 °C | 29 % | 38 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 26 |
| 13 Apr | 29.9 °C | 29 % | 35 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 25 |
| 14 Apr | 29.8 °C | 36 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 15 Apr | 29.6 °C | 33 % | 34 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 26 |
| 16 Apr | 30.0 °C | 34 % | 37 km/h | 5.4 mm | High 27 |
| 17 Apr | 29.2 °C | 35 % | 35 km/h | 11.4 mm | Very low 4 |
| 18 Apr | 27.3 °C | 40 % | 43 km/h | 4.7 mm | Very low 1 |
| 19 Apr | 28.4 °C | 31 % | 36 km/h | 5.3 mm | Very low 4 |
| 20 Apr | 29.2 °C | 30 % | 44 km/h | 0.6 mm | Very low 2 |
| 21 Apr | 29.4 °C | 33 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 22 Apr | 30.3 °C | 32 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 23 Apr | 29.9 °C | 32 % | 45 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 24 Apr | 28.8 °C | 43 % | 45 km/h | 0.5 mm | High 22 |
| 25 Apr | 29.6 °C | 34 % | 40 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 26 Apr | 29.7 °C | 39 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 27 Apr | 29.3 °C | 49 % | 39 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 28 Apr | 31.2 °C | 36 % | 30 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 29 Apr | 29.0 °C | 44 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 30 Apr | 33.0 °C | 35 % | 37 km/h | 0.9 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 1 May | 32.1 °C | 36 % | 42 km/h | 0.3 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 2 May | 31.1 °C | 40 % | 48 km/h | 1.1 mm | High 24 |
| 3 May | 30.5 °C | 42 % | 38 km/h | 2.3 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 4 May | 31.0 °C | 41 % | 35 km/h | 7.1 mm | Low 8 |
| 5 May after | 27.3 °C | 59 % | 36 km/h | 15.0 mm | Very low 2 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 27.1, a minimum humidity of 35% and 11 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 19.
FWI at the start
27.1
Minimum humidity
35 %
Days without rain
11
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Chilpancingo de los Bravo fire, 9 April 2017
7,635 ha
26 days
FWI 27.1
Min. humidity 35 %
Chilpancingo de los Bravo fire, May 2020
2,298 ha
12 days
FWI 25.0
Min. humidity 33 %
8 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.3 mm on 3 Jun.
Chilpancingo de los Bravo fire, April 2019
4,916 ha
16 days
FWI 30.6
Min. humidity 34 %
6 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Leonardo Bravo fire, April 2020
4,045 ha
15 days
FWI 23.9
Min. humidity 36 %
17 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.6 mm on 21 Apr.
Ajuchitlán del Progreso fire, April 2020
4,844 ha
12 days
FWI 24.8
Min. humidity 35 %
91 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Ajuchitlán del Progreso fire, April 2020
5,145 ha
27 days
FWI 26.0
Min. humidity 37 %
113 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 15 days
- median duration
- 4,198 ha
- median area
- 0 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- 1.4 mm
- rain at the end (median; 14 of 19 had it)
It was 1.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 26 days, against 15 days.
Only 1 of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 5 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.4 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
15.0 mmfirst rain
5 Maythe day after it ended
48km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 4 May, and on 5 May 15.0 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 14 of 19, with a median of 1.4 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 2 Apr 2017
After · 11 May 2017
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 337Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 11,320 haChilpancingo de los Bravo12 April 2018 · 20 days · 18 km away
- 15,921 haLeonardo BravoApril 2021 · 28 days · 19 km away
- 9,270 haChilpancingo de los Bravo2 May 2019 · 16 days · 26 km away
- 9,972 haChilpancingo de los BravoMarch 2021 · 18 days · 32 km away
- 8,926 haCoyuca de Benítez23 April 2019 · 32 days · 32 km away
- 12,746 haAcapulco de Juárez27 March 2017 · 36 days · 35 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Chilpancingo de los Bravo fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 9 April 2017 to 4 May 2017 (26 days). The perimeter dates it from 9 April 2017 to 28 April 2017.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,635 hectares (76.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Chilpancingo de los Bravo (6,929 ha, 3.2 %); Leonardo Bravo (1,209 ha, 1.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.0 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 28, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 4,198 ha; 0 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 1 of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 5 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.4 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Area: 8,093 → 7,635 ha.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 9 April 2017 to 28 April 2017. 337 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.