Skip to content
worldfires
MX · Mexico · –

Leonardo Bravo fire, April 2021 Chilpancingo de los Bravo, Leonardo Bravo, Eduardo Neri

Out · last detection 4 May 2021, 19:17 UTC

The fire started on 7 April 2021 in Leonardo Bravo, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 28 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 15,921 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 15th largest in Guerrero since 2016 (of 582 with a page). Number 3 in Mexico in 2021, of 294.

Burnt area
15,921ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
28days
7 Apr 2021 – 4 May 2021
Municipalities hit
3
municipalities
Started on
7 Apr
2021
Heat detections
865
in a single hotspot: 185 MW
Danger at start
11
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
209MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 7 Apr4 May
4 May 2021

How it evolved, day by day

7 Apr 2021 · 1 MW · 1 8 Apr 2021 · 13 MW · 4 9 Apr 2021 · 12 MW · 4 10 Apr 2021 · 141 MW · 16 11 Apr 2021 · 220 MW · 27 12 Apr 2021 · 99 MW · 51 13 Apr 2021 · 927 MW · 69 14 Apr 2021 · 117 MW · 52 15 Apr 2021 · 421 MW · 93 16 Apr 2021 · 380 MW · 39 17 Apr 2021 · 168 MW · 32 18 Apr 2021 · 224 MW · 54 19 Apr 2021 · 945 MW · 88 20 Apr 2021 · 570 MW · 82 21 Apr 2021 · 531 MW · 93 22 Apr 2021 · 128 MW · 39 23 Apr 2021 · 148 MW · 41 24 Apr 2021 · 175 MW · 33 25 Apr 2021 · 88 MW · 21 26 Apr 2021 · 18 MW · 7 27 Apr 2021 · 59 MW · 7 28 Apr 2021 · 10 MW · 3 29 Apr 2021 · 8 MW · 3 2 May 2021 · 8 MW · 2 3 May 2021 · 3 MW · 1 4 May 2021 · 18 MW · 3
7 Apr 13 Apr 19 Apr 25 Apr 3 May

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

26°high
48km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity

It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 13.9 mm on 6 May.

This area had burned before

82% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 197 ha in 2016, 8,350 ha in 2017, 11,672 ha in 2019, 135 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 13,111 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 10% of the area of London (159 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Chilpancingo de los Bravo 283,354 inhabitants
    11,132 ha reached on 7 Apr
    5.1 %
  2. Leonardo Bravo where it started
    4,085 ha reached on 8 Apr
    5.6 %
  3. 1,495 ha reached on 11 Apr
    1.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area4.6 ha
Residents≈ 650

Inside the perimeter there were about 4.6 hectares of built-up land and about 650 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

Official record

Several official records match this area

According to CONAFOR, 10 fires started inside this perimeter on these dates, totalling 6,873 ha (the satellite measured 15,921 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.

CONAFOR records each fire that started at a different time or place separately; the satellite sees a single burned area, so this page groups them together. The numbers on the map show where each one started.

  1. 1 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido La Cienega 10 April 2021 1,854 ha · extinguished on 16 April 2021 · cause: negligence
  2. 2 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido San Vicente 10 April 2021 1,696 ha · extinguished on 22 April 2021 · cause: negligence
  3. 3 Eduardo Neri Ejido El Palmar o Barrio Nuevo 10 April 2021 503 ha · extinguished on 20 April 2021 · cause: negligence
  4. 4 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido Amojileca 13 April 2021 643 ha · extinguished on 25 April 2021 · cause: unknown
  5. 5 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido Amojileca 14 April 2021 99 ha · extinguished on 18 April 2021 · cause: unknown
  6. 6 Leonardo Bravo Ejido Chichihualco 16 April 2021 1,405 ha · extinguished on 28 April 2021 · cause: unknown
  7. 7 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido Omiltemi 18 April 2021 512 ha · extinguished on 27 April 2021 · cause: negligence
  8. 8 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido Xocomanatlan 24 April 2021 131 ha · extinguished on 28 April 2021 · cause: negligence
  9. 9 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido La Cienega 27 April 2021 23 ha · extinguished on 29 April 2021 · cause: unknown
  10. 10 Chilpancingo de los Bravo Ejido La Cienega 27 April 2021 8 ha · extinguished on 30 April 2021 · cause: unknown

Total according to CONAFOR: 6,873 ha, 43 % of the 15,921 ha in the satellite perimeter.

CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal), estadística de incendios forestales en datos.gob.mx (CC BY 4.0). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Apr 22.8 °C 27 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 11
8 Apr 22.7 °C 29 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
9 Apr 22.4 °C 35 % 41 km/h 1.6 mm Low 8
10 Apr 24.6 °C 26 % 40 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 16
11 Apr 24.8 °C 29 % 38 km/h 0.4 mm Moderate 19
12 Apr 23.0 °C 36 % 39 km/h 0.6 mm Moderate 16
13 Apr 24.5 °C 31 % 44 km/h 1.1 mm Moderate 14
14 Apr 23.4 °C 22 % 45 km/h 0.3 mm High 22
15 Apr 24.9 °C 23 % 38 km/h 0.6 mm High 22
16 Apr 25.1 °C 16 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
17 Apr 24.3 °C 29 % 45 km/h 0.2 mm High 26
18 Apr 23.0 °C 25 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
19 Apr 22.9 °C 13 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
20 Apr 24.0 °C 14 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
21 Apr 24.0 °C 21 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
22 Apr 24.2 °C 21 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
23 Apr 23.6 °C 30 % 41 km/h 0.8 mm Moderate 20
24 Apr 23.9 °C 32 % 42 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 21
25 Apr 24.6 °C 29 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
26 Apr 25.5 °C 26 % 44 km/h 0.2 mm High 26
27 Apr 25.4 °C 27 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
28 Apr 24.5 °C 30 % 40 km/h 0.5 mm High 26
29 Apr 23.6 °C 32 % 41 km/h 0.6 mm High 23
30 Apr 21.7 °C 39 % 37 km/h 2.1 mm Low 7
1 May 21.8 °C 37 % 37 km/h 5.3 mm Very low 3
2 May 22.3 °C 38 % 38 km/h 0.5 mm Low 8
3 May 21.6 °C 36 % 41 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 14
4 May 23.0 °C 32 % 41 km/h 0.4 mm Moderate 18
5 May after 23.6 °C 25 % 46 km/h 0.2 mm High 24
6 May after 22.3 °C 43 % 38 km/h 13.9 mm Very low 1

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 11.3, a minimum humidity of 27% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 11.3
Minimum humidity 27 %
Days without rain 0
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

San Miguel Totolapan fire, May 2017
1,853 ha 7 days FWI 9.6 Min. humidity 27 % 82 km away, in 2017

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 10.1 mm on 25 May.

What happened to them

11 days
median duration
2,298 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 16 of 16 had it)

It was 6.9 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 28 days, against 11 days.

None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

13.9 mmfirst rain
6 May2 days after it ended
48km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 4 May, and on 6 May 13.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 16 of 16, with a median of 2.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Mar 2021
After · 11 May 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 865Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Mexico

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Leonardo Bravo fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 7 April 2021 to 4 May 2021 (28 days). The perimeter dates it from 8 April 2021 to 27 April 2021.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 15,921 hectares (159.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Chilpancingo de los Bravo (11,132 ha, 5.1 %); Leonardo Bravo (4,085 ha, 5.6 %); Eduardo Neri (1,495 ha, 1.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 25.5 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 11 days and their median area 2,298 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 2.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Area: 16,614 → 15,921 ha.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 3 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 8 April 2021 to 27 April 2021. 865 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with CONAFOR: 6,873 official ha against 15,921 ha of perimeter; similar, but with reservations.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.