Skip to content
worldfires
en
BR · Brazil · →

Bannach fire, 26 August 2017 Bannach

Out · last detection 7 Sept 2017, 16:19 UTC

The fire started on 26 August 2017 in Bannach, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,845 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 419th largest in Pará since 2016 (of 1096 with a page). Number 368 in Brazil in 2017, of 994.

Compare with…

Suggestions: Bannach · 2022Bannach · 2020Bannach · 2024Bannach · 2024

Burnt area
5,845ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
13days
26 Aug 2017 – 7 Sept 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
26 Aug
2017
Heat detections
230
in a single hotspot: 36 MW
Danger at start
41
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
147MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 26 Aug7 Sept
7 Sept 2017

How it evolved, day by day

26 Aug 2017 · 16 MW · 2 28 Aug 2017 · 25 MW · 3 29 Aug 2017 · 7 MW · 1 30 Aug 2017 · 2 MW · 2 2 Sept 2017 · 5 MW · 5 3 Sept 2017 · 311 MW · 30 4 Sept 2017 · 884 MW · 149 5 Sept 2017 · 118 MW · 30 6 Sept 2017 · 98 MW · 7 7 Sept 2017 · 3 MW · 1
26 Aug 29 Aug 2 Sept 4 Sept 6 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
44km/h · peak gust
22%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.7% of the area of London (58 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Bannach 4,031 inhabitants where it started
    5,882 ha reached on 26 Aug
    2.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area1.7 ha
Residents≈ 80

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.7 hectares of built-up land and about 80 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
26 Aug 34.0 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
27 Aug 34.7 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
28 Aug 34.4 °C 26 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
29 Aug 33.6 °C 28 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
30 Aug 35.0 °C 26 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
31 Aug 35.2 °C 26 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
1 Sept 33.6 °C 31 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
2 Sept 31.9 °C 34 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
3 Sept 33.6 °C 22 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
4 Sept 32.4 °C 28 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
5 Sept 33.5 °C 29 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
6 Sept 33.3 °C 29 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
7 Sept 33.9 °C 33 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
8 Sept after 33.3 °C 35 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
9 Sept after 32.9 °C 32 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
10 Sept after 34.8 °C 28 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
11 Sept after 35.0 °C 28 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
12 Sept after 34.7 °C 24 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
13 Sept after 34.0 °C 27 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
14 Sept after 34.5 °C 27 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Sept after 35.4 °C 25 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
16 Sept after 34.4 °C 22 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
17 Sept after 33.9 °C 24 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 19 Aug 2017
After · 14 Sept 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 230Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Bannach fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 26 August 2017 to 7 September 2017 (13 days). The perimeter dates it from 2 September 2017 to 7 September 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,845 hectares (58.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Bannach (5,882 ha, 2.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.2 °C, humidity dropped to 22 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 2 September 2017 to 7 September 2017. 230 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.