Bannach fire, August 2020 Bannach, Cumaru do Norte, Ourilândia do Norte
The fire started on 28 August 2020 in Bannach, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 22 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 36,268 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 48th largest in Pará since 2016 (of 1095 with a page). Number 37 in Brazil in 2020, of 957.
- Burnt area
- 36,268ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 22days
- 28 Aug 2020 – 18 Sept 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 28 Aug
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 1,798
- in a single hotspot: 220 MW
- Danger at start
- 43
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 25.2GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.2 mm on 22 Sept.
This area had burned before
61% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,176 ha in 2016, 21,298 ha in 2017.
- 9,197 ha Bannach fire, September 2017 13,532 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,906 ha Bannach fire, September 2017 5,845 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,485 ha Bannach fire, September 2017 6,718 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 765 ha Bannach fire, September 2017 4,072 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 679 ha Cumaru do Norte fire, September 2017 9,594 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 6 ha Bannach fire, August 2017 3,353 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
36,074 ha reached on 28 Aug12 %
-
Cumaru do Norte 14,036 inhabitants334 ha reached on 16 Sept0.0 %
-
Ourilândia do Norte 32,467 inhabitants92 ha reached on 18 Sept0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug | 35.6 °C | 21 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 22 Aug | 34.5 °C | 27 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 23 Aug | 34.2 °C | 31 % | 29 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 38 |
| 24 Aug | 30.6 °C | 47 % | 34 km/h | 0.5 mm | High 28 |
| 25 Aug | 32.9 °C | 38 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 26 Aug | 32.7 °C | 45 % | 24 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 27 |
| 27 Aug | 33.8 °C | 34 % | 27 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 30 |
| 28 Aug | 32.7 °C | 43 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 30 |
| 29 Aug | 33.9 °C | 30 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 30 Aug | 33.6 °C | 32 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 31 Aug | 34.2 °C | 28 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 1 Sept | 34.3 °C | 21 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 2 Sept | 34.2 °C | 24 % | 58 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 3 Sept | 33.4 °C | 26 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 4 Sept | 34.4 °C | 20 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 5 Sept | 35.8 °C | 21 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 6 Sept | 35.2 °C | 24 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 7 Sept | 36.0 °C | 15 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 8 Sept | 35.7 °C | 22 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 9 Sept | 35.5 °C | 26 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 10 Sept | 35.2 °C | 26 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 11 Sept | 36.4 °C | 19 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 12 Sept | 35.7 °C | 23 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 13 Sept | 35.0 °C | 18 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 14 Sept | 35.8 °C | 19 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 15 Sept | 35.4 °C | 20 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 16 Sept | 35.6 °C | 21 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 17 Sept | 35.6 °C | 28 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 18 Sept | 35.8 °C | 25 % | 31 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 41 |
| 19 Sept after | 34.8 °C | 36 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 20 Sept after | 35.4 °C | 37 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 21 Sept after | 32.7 °C | 48 % | 29 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 27 |
| 22 Sept after | 30.5 °C | 56 % | 25 km/h | 3.2 mm | Low 6 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 1,798Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 28,956 haBannach22 August 2022 · 22 days · 15 km away
- 27,202 haBannachJuly 2024 · 18 days · 27 km away
- 17,696 haCumaru do Norte1 September 2017 · 20 days · 30 km away
- 59,116 haCumaru do Norte21 August 2024 · 34 days · 35 km away
- 27,839 haBannach18 August 2024 · 36 days · 37 km away
- 26,430 haCumaru do NorteAugust 2020 · 20 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Bannach fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 28 August 2020 and 18 September 2020: 22 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 36,268 hectares (362.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Bannach (36,074 ha, 12 %); Cumaru do Norte (334 ha, 0.0 %); Ourilândia do Norte (92 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.4 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 58 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.