Bannach fire, July 2024 Bannach, Cumaru do Norte, Ourilândia do Norte
The fire started on 27 July 2024 in Bannach, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 18 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 27,202 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 72th largest in Pará since 2016 (of 1095 with a page). Number 105 in Brazil in 2024, of 1301.
- Burnt area
- 27,202ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 18days
- 27 Jul 2024 – 13 Aug 2024
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 27 Jul
- 2024
- Heat detections
- 1,450
- in a single hotspot: 138 MW
- Danger at start
- 40
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 9.7GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 9.0 mm on 14 Aug.
This area had burned before
82% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 13,277 ha in 2017, 2,820 ha in 2019, 9,639 ha in 2020, 15,985 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 22,350 ha that had burned before.
- 14,408 ha Bannach fire, August 2022 28,956 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,390 ha Bannach fire, September 2020 12,405 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,839 ha Bannach fire, August 2020 36,268 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 998 ha Cumaru do Norte fire, September 2017 17,696 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 409 ha Bannach fire, August 2017 3,353 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
15,008 ha reached on 29 Jul5.0 %
-
Cumaru do Norte 14,036 inhabitants8,900 ha reached on 29 Jul0.5 %
-
Ourilândia do Norte 32,467 inhabitants3,448 ha reached on 1 Aug0.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul | 33.6 °C | 27 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 28 Jul | 33.9 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 29 Jul | 34.8 °C | 24 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 30 Jul | 35.1 °C | 24 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 31 Jul | 35.3 °C | 22 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 1 Aug | 34.7 °C | 23 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 2 Aug | 33.9 °C | 24 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 3 Aug | 33.7 °C | 27 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 4 Aug | 33.9 °C | 25 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 5 Aug | 33.3 °C | 25 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 6 Aug | 34.2 °C | 17 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 7 Aug | 34.3 °C | 22 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 8 Aug | 35.6 °C | 18 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 9 Aug | 36.4 °C | 21 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Aug | 35.5 °C | 24 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 11 Aug | 34.7 °C | 30 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 12 Aug | 36.3 °C | 23 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 13 Aug | 35.3 °C | 27 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 14 Aug after | 31.3 °C | 50 % | 31 km/h | 9.0 mm | Low 6 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 10 August 2024 the air beside the fire reached 49 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 30: 2.0 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1,450Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 27,839 haBannach18 August 2024 · 36 days · 11 km away
- 28,956 haBannach22 August 2022 · 22 days · 12 km away
- 17,696 haCumaru do Norte1 September 2017 · 20 days · 17 km away
- 36,268 haBannachAugust 2020 · 22 days · 27 km away
- 59,116 haCumaru do Norte21 August 2024 · 34 days · 29 km away
- 26,430 haCumaru do NorteAugust 2020 · 20 days · 32 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Bannach fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 July 2024 and 13 August 2024: 18 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 27,202 hectares (272.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Bannach (15,008 ha, 5.0 %); Cumaru do Norte (8,900 ha, 0.5 %); Ourilândia do Norte (3,448 ha, 0.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.4 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.