Skip to content
worldfires
GT · Guatemala · –

Yepocapa fire, February 2017 Yepocapa, Alotenango, Siquinalá

Out · last detection 28 Feb 2017, 08:20 UTC

The fire started on 22 February 2017 in Yepocapa, Guatemala, and satellites saw it burning for 12 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,376 hectares from heat detections, spread across 6 municipalities.

We are reviewing this page: some of its data look inconsistent (the place, the dates or the area), so treat them with caution.

The power measured by the satellite is low (29.3 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
4,376ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
12days
22 Feb 2017 – 5 Mar 2017
Municipalities hit
6
municipalities
Started on
22 Feb
2017
Heat detections
157
in a single hotspot: 29 MW
Danger at start
0
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
142MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 22 Feb5 Mar
28 Feb 2017

How it evolved, day by day

22 Feb 2017 · 10 MW · 2 25 Feb 2017 · 410 MW · 154 28 Feb 2017 · 6 MW · 1
22 Feb 25 Feb 28 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

16°high
58km/h · peak gust
28%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.2 mm on 11 Mar.

This area had burned before

75% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 13,400 ha in 2016. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,294 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.8% of the area of London (44 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Yepocapa where it started
    1,791 ha reached on 22 Feb
    8.7 %
  2. 1,028 ha reached on 25 Feb
    11 %
  3. Siquinalá 20,843 inhabitants
    882 ha reached on 25 Feb
    4.8 %
  4. Escuintla 16,187 inhabitants
    622 ha reached on 25 Feb
    1.1 %
  5. 55 ha
    1.2 %
  6. 24 ha
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
22 Feb 11.7 °C 55 % 36 km/h 3.9 mm Very low 0
23 Feb 12.4 °C 52 % 42 km/h 3.0 mm Very low 0
24 Feb 10.9 °C 59 % 38 km/h 2.5 mm Very low 0
25 Feb 11.4 °C 64 % 33 km/h 5.6 mm Very low 0
26 Feb 12.4 °C 47 % 29 km/h 2.7 mm Very low 0
27 Feb 13.9 °C 40 % 36 km/h 0.1 mm Very low 0
28 Feb 14.1 °C 38 % 34 km/h 0.9 mm Very low 0
1 Mar 13.9 °C 42 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
2 Mar 15.3 °C 36 % 37 km/h 0.4 mm Very low 3
3 Mar 15.5 °C 28 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
4 Mar 14.9 °C 35 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
5 Mar 15.1 °C 29 % 47 km/h 0.1 mm Low 8
6 Mar after 14.1 °C 30 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Low 8
7 Mar after 15.6 °C 30 % 39 km/h 0.1 mm Low 8
8 Mar after 14.2 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Low 8
9 Mar after 15.6 °C 27 % 39 km/h 0.3 mm Low 9
10 Mar after 15.8 °C 29 % 41 km/h 0.1 mm Low 10
11 Mar after 12.8 °C 40 % 36 km/h 3.2 mm Very low 1

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 0.2, a minimum humidity of 55% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 15.

FWI at the start 0.2
Minimum humidity 55 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

San Mateo Ixtatán fire, May 2024
2,093 ha 12 days FWI 0.4 Min. humidity 55 % 168 km away, in 2024

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 8.6 mm on 13 May.

What happened to them

10 days
median duration
1,250 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
4.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 15 of 15 had it)

It was 3.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 12 days, against 10 days.

None of its 15 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

3.2 mmfirst rain
11 Mar6 days after it ended
58km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 5 Mar, and on 11 Mar 3.2 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 15 of 15, with a median of 4.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 15 Feb 2017
After · 12 Mar 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 157Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Guatemala

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Yepocapa fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 22 February 2017 to 5 March 2017 (12 days). The perimeter dates it from 23 February 2017 to 3 March 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,376 hectares (43.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 6 municipalities: Yepocapa (1,791 ha, 8.7 %); Alotenango (1,028 ha, 11 %); Siquinalá (882 ha, 4.8 %); Escuintla (622 ha, 1.1 %); San Miguel Dueñas (55 ha, 1.2 %); Acatenango (24 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 15.5 °C, humidity dropped to 28 % and gusts hit 58 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 8, class Low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Guatemala (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 15. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 1,250 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 15 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 122 · 123 · 1566 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 3 March 2017 → 5 March 2017.
  2. Start date: 23 February 2017 → 22 February 2017.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 122 · 123 · 1566.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 23 February 2017 to 3 March 2017. 157 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.