Skip to content
worldfires
SD · Sudan · –

Talawdi fire, 16 November 2023 Talawdi

Out · last detection 23 Nov 2023, 10:55 UTC

The fire started on 16 November 2023 in Talawdi, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,061 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 76th largest in South Kordofan since 2016 (of 314 with a page). Number 16 in Sudan in 2023, of 95.

Burnt area
4,061ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
8days
16 Nov 2023 – 23 Nov 2023
Municipalities hit
1
localities
Started on
16 Nov
2023
Heat detections
139
in a single hotspot: 43 MW
Danger at start
32
High · FWI index
Average daily power
172MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 16 Nov23 Nov
23 Nov 2023

How it evolved, day by day

16 Nov 2023 · 91 MW · 8 19 Nov 2023 · 179 MW · 21 20 Nov 2023 · 135 MW · 44 21 Nov 2023 · 276 MW · 34 22 Nov 2023 · 332 MW · 30 23 Nov 2023 · 16 MW · 2
16 Nov 20 Nov 22 Nov

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
37km/h · peak gust
16%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

51% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,380 ha in 2016, 1,308 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,059 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.6% of the area of London (41 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Talawdi where it started
    4,090 ha reached on 16 Nov
    1.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
16 Nov 37.4 °C 20 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
17 Nov 37.2 °C 20 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
18 Nov 36.4 °C 21 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
19 Nov 35.2 °C 26 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
20 Nov 36.1 °C 21 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
21 Nov 36.8 °C 17 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
22 Nov 37.0 °C 16 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
23 Nov 38.5 °C 18 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
24 Nov after 38.5 °C 18 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
25 Nov after 39.2 °C 17 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
26 Nov after 39.1 °C 14 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
27 Nov after 38.1 °C 16 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
28 Nov after 38.6 °C 13 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
29 Nov after 38.3 °C 17 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
30 Nov after 38.1 °C 18 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
1 Dec after 38.2 °C 15 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
2 Dec after 37.6 °C 15 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
3 Dec after 38.0 °C 16 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 32.5, a minimum humidity of 20% and 4 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 32.5
Minimum humidity 20 %
Days without rain 4
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Talawdi fire, October 2016
3,843 ha 16 days FWI 32.5 Min. humidity 20 % 6 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

8 days
median duration
3,110 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.9 mm
rain at the end (median; 1 of 16 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (4,061 ha against a median of 3,110 ha) and lasted 8 days, against 8 days.

In 15 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
37km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 23 Nov, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 1 of 16, with a median of 2.9 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 9 Nov 2023
After · 30 Nov 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 22 November 2023 the air beside the fire reached 37 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 25: 1.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak37 µg/m³
Days over the guideline6 days
PM1094 µg/m³
Optical depth0.36
17 Nov19 Nov21 Nov23 Nov25 Nov
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 139Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Talawdi fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 16 November 2023 to 23 November 2023 (8 days). The perimeter dates it from 19 November 2023 to 22 November 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,061 hectares (40.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Talawdi (4,090 ha, 1.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.5 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 38, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 8 days and their median area 3,110 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 15 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 22 November 2023 → 23 November 2023.
  2. Start date: 19 November 2023 → 16 November 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 19 November 2023 to 22 November 2023. 139 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.