Skip to content
worldfires
SD · Sudan · –

Talawdi fire, 5 November 2017 Talawdi

Out · last detection 13 Nov 2017, 12:04 UTC

The fire started on 5 November 2017 in Talawdi, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,178 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 127th largest in South Kordofan since 2016 (of 314 with a page). Number 56 in Sudan in 2017, of 137.

Burnt area
3,178ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
8days
5 Nov 2017 – 12 Nov 2017
Municipalities hit
1
localities
Started on
5 Nov
2017
Heat detections
83
in a single hotspot: 91 MW
Danger at start
29
High · FWI index
Average daily power
238MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Nov12 Nov
13 Nov 2017

How it evolved, day by day

5 Nov 2017 · 10 MW · 1 8 Nov 2017 · 693 MW · 30 9 Nov 2017 · 220 MW · 26 10 Nov 2017 · 497 MW · 21 12 Nov 2017 · 2 MW · 4 13 Nov 2017 · 6 MW · 1
8 Nov 12 Nov

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
42km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

23% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 725 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2% of the area of London (32 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Talawdi where it started
    3,201 ha reached on 5 Nov
    0.9 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 55 % of the area in Sudan

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Nov 35.1 °C 14 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
6 Nov 34.9 °C 14 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
7 Nov 36.3 °C 13 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
8 Nov 37.0 °C 15 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
9 Nov 37.0 °C 21 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
10 Nov 37.9 °C 16 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
11 Nov 37.3 °C 15 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
12 Nov 36.7 °C 15 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
13 Nov after 37.1 °C 20 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
14 Nov after 38.4 °C 17 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
15 Nov after 39.0 °C 17 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
16 Nov after 39.1 °C 15 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
17 Nov after 37.9 °C 18 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
18 Nov after 37.3 °C 18 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
19 Nov after 38.7 °C 14 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
20 Nov after 38.6 °C 12 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
21 Nov after 37.7 °C 12 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
22 Nov after 36.3 °C 10 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 29.4, a minimum humidity of 14% and 4 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 33.

FWI at the start 29.4
Minimum humidity 14 %
Days without rain 4
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Keilak fire, October 2016
2,666 ha 8 days FWI 30.7 Min. humidity 18 % 83 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

8 days
median duration
3,749 ha
median area
9 %
went past 10,000 ha
2.9 mm
rain at the end (median; 1 of 33 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (3,178 ha against a median of 3,749 ha) and lasted 8 days, against 8 days.

In 32 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 12 Nov, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 1 of 33, with a median of 2.9 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Oct 2017
After · 19 Nov 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 83Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Talawdi fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 5 November 2017 to 12 November 2017 (8 days). The perimeter dates it from 8 November 2017 to 10 November 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,178 hectares (31.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Talawdi (3,201 ha, 0.9 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.9 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 41, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 33. Their median duration was 8 days and their median area 3,749 ha; 9 % went past 10,000 ha. In 32 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 10 November 2017 → 12 November 2017.
  2. Start date: 8 November 2017 → 5 November 2017.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 8 November 2017 to 10 November 2017. 83 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.