Sinaloa fire, May 2023 Sinaloa, Guadalupe y Calvo
The fire started on 26 May 2023 in Sinaloa, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,418 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 45th largest in Sinaloa since 2016 (of 84 with a page). Number 141 in Mexico in 2023, of 286.
The power measured by the satellite is low (20.9 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 2,418ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 8days
- 26 May 2023 – 2 Jun 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 26 May
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 111
- in a single hotspot: 21 MW
- Danger at start
- 48
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 472MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 41 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
1% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 36 ha in 2017.
What happened to each town
-
2,120 ha reached on 26 May0.3 %
-
311 ha reached on 29 May0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
Official record
According to CONAFOR, 2 fires started inside this perimeter on these dates, totalling 1,716 ha (the satellite measured 2,418 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
- Sinaloa Sinaloa 26 May 2023 1,452 ha · extinguished on 2 June 2023 · cause: unknown
- Guadalupe y Calvo Ej. San Ignacio De La Cieneguilla Y Ej. Tohayana Y Anexos 29 May 2023 264 ha · extinguished on 2 June 2023 · cause: arson
CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal), estadística de incendios forestales en datos.gob.mx (CC BY 4.0). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 May | 32.0 °C | 13 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 27 May | 30.2 °C | 19 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 28 May | 28.3 °C | 18 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 29 May | 28.9 °C | 20 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 30 May | 29.6 °C | 20 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 31 May | 30.8 °C | 24 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 1 Jun | 30.0 °C | 23 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 2 Jun | 30.6 °C | 18 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 3 Jun after | 29.9 °C | 20 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 4 Jun after | 32.6 °C | 22 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 5 Jun after | 32.8 °C | 26 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 6 Jun after | 30.5 °C | 29 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 7 Jun after | 30.1 °C | 28 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 8 Jun after | 30.7 °C | 28 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 9 Jun after | 33.6 °C | 23 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 10 Jun after | 33.3 °C | 22 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 11 Jun after | 34.9 °C | 20 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 12 Jun after | 35.5 °C | 17 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 25 May 2023 the air beside the fire reached 62 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 35: 2.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 111Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,595 haGuadalupe y Calvo8 May 2023 · 8 days · 10 km away
- 10,864 haSinaloa21 May 2016 · 20 days · 17 km away
- 15,436 haGuadalupe y Calvo7 May 2023 · 31 days · 21 km away
- 11,643 haGuadalupe y Calvo16 May 2018 · 20 days · 21 km away
- 4,774 haGuadalupe y Calvo9 June 2023 · 10 days · 23 km away
- 10,598 haSinaloaApril 2018 · 21 days · 24 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Sinaloa fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 26 May 2023 and 2 June 2023: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,418 hectares (24.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Sinaloa (2,120 ha, 0.3 %); Guadalupe y Calvo (311 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 32.0 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.