Burned area
satellite only7,869ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 17 Sept 2019 – 25 Sept 2019
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
AO · Angola · –
Quipungo fire, 17 September 2019 Matala, Quipungo
Out · last detection 25 Sept 2019, 23:37 UTC
The fire started on 17 September 2019 in Quipungo, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,869 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 18th largest in Huíla since 2016 (of 46 with a page). Number 86 in Angola in 2019, of 207.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only9days
17 Sept 2019 to 25 Sept 2019: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 25 Sept 2019, 23:37 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only17 Sept 2019
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 17 Sept 2019
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only225
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 180 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 17 Sept 2019 – 25 Sept 2019
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only1,887MW
Total radiative power on 22 September 2019; hotspots that day: 34.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 22 Sept 2019
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model83.1FWI · very extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 17 Sept 2019, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model37.4°C · 7% RH
High of 37.4 °C and minimum humidity of 7% on 19 September 2019; gusts of 47 km/h on 24 September 2019.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 17 Sept 2019 – 25 Sept 2019
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 7,869 ha
- Dates
- 17 Sept 2019 – 25 Sept 2019
- Name
- Quipungo
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/quipungo-2019-09-2?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire quipungo-2019-09-2.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | 7 | 61 | 35.3 | 16.7 | 9 | 18.5 | 41.8 | 0 | 83.1 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-18 | 22 | 173 | 34.9 | 13.4 | 9 | 14.8 | 37.8 | 0 | 74.3 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-19 | 45 | 387 | 37.4 | 16.7 | 7 | 19 | 44.6 | 0 | 78.8 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-20 | 6 | 47 | 35.3 | 17.2 | 8 | 13 | 33.1 | 0 | 66.4 | extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-21 | 0 | 0 | 36.6 | 15.9 | 9 | 16.8 | 33.8 | 0 | 69.3 | extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-22 | 34 | 1,887 | 36.4 | 15.2 | 8 | 13.1 | 32.4 | 0 | 59.1 | extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-23 | 44 | 804 | 36.7 | 16.6 | 8 | 14 | 30.6 | 0 | 59.7 | extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-24 | 11 | 62 | 36.1 | 18.4 | 7 | 21.1 | 46.8 | 0 | 86.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-25 | 56 | 1,692 | 37.1 | 16.7 | 5 | 20.1 | 43.2 | 0 | 74.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2019-09-26 | 0 | 0 | 34.7 | 20.5 | 11 | 23.8 | 51.1 | 0 | 83.6 | muy_extremo | 0 |
| 2019-09-27 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 22.1 | 17 | 19.8 | 43.2 | 0 | 56.1 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-09-28 | 0 | 0 | 35.3 | 18.5 | 12 | 13.7 | 33.5 | 0 | 53 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-09-29 | 0 | 0 | 34.1 | 16.5 | 9 | 18.1 | 37.4 | 0 | 59.6 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 34.1 | 14.1 | 12 | 13.9 | 28.4 | 0 | 51.3 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-10-01 | 0 | 0 | 34.9 | 16.8 | 6 | 11 | 29.2 | 0 | 58.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-10-02 | 0 | 0 | 36.4 | 14.9 | 5 | 16.2 | 34.6 | 0 | 67.6 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-10-03 | 0 | 0 | 35.6 | 15.6 | 8 | 15.9 | 31.7 | 0 | 51.7 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-10-04 | 0 | 0 | 34.9 | 17.9 | 17 | 15 | 33.8 | 0.1 | 64.9 | extremo | 0 |
| 2019-10-05 | 0 | 0 | 35.8 | 19.6 | 16 | 13.7 | 35.6 | 0 | 65.1 | extremo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 7,869ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 9days
- 17 Sept 2019 – 25 Sept 2019
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 17 Sept
- 2019
- Heat detections
- 225
- in a single hotspot: 180 MW
- Danger at start
- 83
- Very extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 639MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
17 Sept25 Sept
25 Sept 2019
How it evolved, day by day
17 Sept
19 Sept
22 Sept
24 Sept
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
37°high
47km/h · peak gust
5%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
68% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,525 ha in 2016, 1,337 ha in 2017, 4,486 ha in 2018. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 5,354 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
6,390 ha reached on 18 Sept0.7 %
-
Quipungo where it started1,522 ha reached on 17 Sept0.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with Very dry air: 41 % of the area in Angola 60 days without rain: 84 % of the area in Angola
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept | 35.3 °C | 9 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 83 |
| 18 Sept | 34.9 °C | 9 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 74 |
| 19 Sept | 37.4 °C | 7 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 79 |
| 20 Sept | 35.3 °C | 8 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 21 Sept | 36.6 °C | 9 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 22 Sept | 36.4 °C | 8 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 23 Sept | 36.7 °C | 8 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 24 Sept | 36.1 °C | 7 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 86 |
| 25 Sept | 37.1 °C | 5 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 74 |
| 26 Sept after | 34.7 °C | 11 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 84 |
| 27 Sept after | 32.7 °C | 17 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 28 Sept after | 35.3 °C | 12 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 29 Sept after | 34.1 °C | 9 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 30 Sept after | 34.1 °C | 12 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 1 Oct after | 34.9 °C | 6 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 2 Oct after | 36.4 °C | 5 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 68 |
| 3 Oct after | 35.6 °C | 8 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 4 Oct after | 34.9 °C | 17 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 5 Oct after | 35.8 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 83.1, a minimum humidity of 9% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.
FWI at the start
83.1
Minimum humidity
9 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Quipungo fire, 17 September 2019
7,869 ha
9 days
FWI 83.1
Min. humidity 9 %
Quipungo fire, August 2024
7,643 ha
17 days
FWI 79.5
Min. humidity 9 %
25 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Cuanhama fire, September 2020
17,500 ha
16 days
FWI 82.4
Min. humidity 10 %
167 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Quipungo fire, August 2024
5,094 ha
14 days
FWI 81.6
Min. humidity 7 %
67 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Cuvelai fire, August 2024
11,544 ha
21 days
FWI 80.6
Min. humidity 9 %
143 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Cuvelai fire, September 2017
5,160 ha
6 days
FWI 81.0
Min. humidity 9 %
163 km away, in 2017
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 14 days
- median duration
- 7,158 ha
- median area
- 27 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- —
- rain at the end (median; 0 of 22 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (7,869 ha against a median of 7,158 ha) and lasted 9 days, against 14 days.
In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
47km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 25 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 22 twins had rain when they ended.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 10 Sept 2019
After · 2 Oct 2019
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 225Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 32,963 haMatala13 August 2024 · 14 days · 9 km away
- 21,094 haQuipungo3 August 2019 · 27 days · 19 km away
- 23,106 haMatala23 September 2026 · 15 days · 23 km away
- 13,987 haQuipungo20 August 2024 · 17 days · 25 km away
- 16,928 haQuipungo25 September 2026 · 6 days · 26 km away
- 12,933 haMatalaAugust 2017 · 5 days · 26 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Quipungo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 17 September 2019 and 25 September 2019: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,869 hectares (78.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Matala (6,390 ha, 0.7 %); Quipungo (1,522 ha, 0.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.4 °C, humidity dropped to 5 % and gusts hit 47 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 86, class Very extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 14 days and their median area 7,158 ha; 27 % went past 10,000 ha. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 225 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.