Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain · →

Porto do Son fire, September 2019 Porto do Son, Ribeira

Out · last detection 7 Sept 2019, 13:23 UTC

The fire started on 7 September 2019 in Porto do Son, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 211 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 6 September 2019 at 23:04 and declared extinguished on 8 September 2019.

It is the 12th largest in A Coruña since 2016 (of 20 with a page). Number 48 in Spain in 2019, of 102.

Compare with…
Burnt area
211ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
7 Sept 2019 – 7 Sept 2019
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
7 Sept
2019
Heat detections
33
in a single hotspot: 77 MW
Danger at start
23
High · FWI index
Average daily power
751MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 7 Sept7 Sept

How it evolved, day by day

7 Sept 2019 · 751 MW · 33

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

24°high
60km/h · peak gust
40%lowest humidity

It had gone 19 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 6.1 mm on 16 Sept.

This area had burned before

1% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3 ha in 2018.

What happened to each town

  1. Porto do Son 9,060 inhabitants · 9.6 km from the centre where it started
    155 ha reached on 7 Sept
    1.6 %
  2. Ribeira 27,102 inhabitants · 6.0 km from the centre
    56 ha reached on 7 Sept
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Coniferous forest58 %
  • Mixed forest17 %
  • Agricultural areas13 %
  • Scrub and transitional woodland6.1 %
  • Other natural land4.7 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

Official record

According to EGIF (MITECO), this fire started on 6 September 2019 and burned 198 ha (the satellite measured 211 ha).

MITECO, Estadística General de Incendios Forestales (EGIF). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Sept 24.5 °C 40 % 60 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
8 Sept after 25.0 °C 48 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
9 Sept after 20.7 °C 57 % 41 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 15
10 Sept after 19.8 °C 50 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
11 Sept after 22.5 °C 52 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
12 Sept after 27.3 °C 41 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
13 Sept after 29.5 °C 43 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
14 Sept after 28.5 °C 46 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
15 Sept after 28.3 °C 50 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
16 Sept after 25.8 °C 59 % 33 km/h 6.1 mm Very low 2

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Aug 2019
After · 14 Sept 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 7 September 2019 the air beside the fire reached 14 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak14 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1023 µg/m³
5678910
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 33Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Porto do Son fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 7 September 2019 and 7 September 2019: 1 day between the first and last image with fire. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 6 September 2019 at 23:04 and declared extinguished on 8 September 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 211 hectares (2.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Porto do Son (155 ha, 1.6 %); Ribeira (56 ha, 0.8 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire came within 6.0 km of the centre of Ribeira, the closest of the areas it touched. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 24.5 °C, humidity dropped to 40 % and gusts hit 60 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 23, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 33 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 198 official ha against 211 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.