Skip to content
worldfires
MM · Myanmar · –

Nyaungshwe fire, January 2024 Nyaungshwe, Pinlaung, Pekon

Out · last detection 8 Feb 2024, 06:50 UTC

The fire started on 19 January 2024 in Nyaungshwe, Myanmar, and satellites saw it burning for 21 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,000 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 107th largest in Shan since 2016 (of 625 with a page). Number 43 in Myanmar in 2024, of 174.

Burnt area
5,000ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
21days
19 Jan 2024 – 8 Feb 2024
Municipalities hit
3
municipalities
Started on
19 Jan
2024
Heat detections
200
in a single hotspot: 63 MW
Danger at start
16
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
90MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 19 Jan8 Feb
8 Feb 2024

How it evolved, day by day

19 Jan 2024 · 6 MW · 1 20 Jan 2024 · 63 MW · 8 21 Jan 2024 · 10 MW · 2 22 Jan 2024 · 126 MW · 17 23 Jan 2024 · 450 MW · 47 24 Jan 2024 · 177 MW · 23 26 Jan 2024 · 301 MW · 28 27 Jan 2024 · 157 MW · 20 28 Jan 2024 · 102 MW · 16 29 Jan 2024 · 36 MW · 7 30 Jan 2024 · 19 MW · 2 1 Feb 2024 · 49 MW · 9 2 Feb 2024 · 63 MW · 1 3 Feb 2024 · 67 MW · 8 4 Feb 2024 · 37 MW · 3 5 Feb 2024 · 21 MW · 4 6 Feb 2024 · 10 MW · 1 7 Feb 2024 · 13 MW · 2 8 Feb 2024 · 11 MW · 1
19 Jan 23 Jan 28 Jan 2 Feb 6 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
44km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 27 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

100% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,763 ha in 2017, 3,767 ha in 2019, 3,769 ha in 2020, 3,272 ha in 2021, 4,610 ha in 2022, 4,012 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,977 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.2% of the area of London (50 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Nyaungshwe where it started
    4,067 ha reached on 19 Jan
    2.7 %
  2. 947 ha reached on 23 Jan
    0.3 %
  3. 2 ha
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area4.5 ha
Residents≈ 1,700

Inside the perimeter there were about 4.5 hectares of built-up land and about 1,700 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
19 Jan 26.7 °C 37 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
20 Jan 26.7 °C 41 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
21 Jan 25.6 °C 38 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
22 Jan 26.6 °C 40 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
23 Jan 26.3 °C 33 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
24 Jan 26.3 °C 42 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
25 Jan 26.1 °C 42 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
26 Jan 25.1 °C 52 % 37 km/h 0.5 mm Moderate 18
27 Jan 26.2 °C 45 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
28 Jan 27.4 °C 29 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
29 Jan 27.1 °C 39 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
30 Jan 26.8 °C 40 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
31 Jan 27.1 °C 32 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
1 Feb 27.5 °C 27 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
2 Feb 27.5 °C 33 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
3 Feb 27.2 °C 36 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
4 Feb 28.3 °C 30 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
5 Feb 29.0 °C 27 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
6 Feb 29.7 °C 29 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
7 Feb 30.2 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
8 Feb 30.6 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
9 Feb after 31.0 °C 27 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
10 Feb after 31.0 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
11 Feb after 30.5 °C 28 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
12 Feb after 29.9 °C 33 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
13 Feb after 30.1 °C 28 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
14 Feb after 30.8 °C 28 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
15 Feb after 31.2 °C 31 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
16 Feb after 31.6 °C 30 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
17 Feb after 29.9 °C 20 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
18 Feb after 30.8 °C 17 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 16.1, a minimum humidity of 37% and 27 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 27.

FWI at the start 16.1
Minimum humidity 37 %
Days without rain 27
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Loikaw fire, December 2020
2,608 ha 13 days FWI 20.2 Min. humidity 37 % 41 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.2 mm on 11 Jan.

What happened to them

13 days
median duration
2,937 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.0 mm
rain at the end (median; 8 of 27 had it)

It was 1.7 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 21 days, against 13 days.

Only 6 of its 27 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 19 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.0 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 8 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 8 of 27, with a median of 3.0 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 12 Jan 2024
After · 15 Feb 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 3 February 2024 the air beside the fire reached 50 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 36: 2.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak50 µg/m³
Days over the guideline8 days
PM1074 µg/m³
Optical depth0.47
17 Jan21 Jan25 Jan29 Jan2 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 200Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Myanmar

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Nyaungshwe fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 19 January 2024 to 8 February 2024 (21 days). The perimeter dates it from 19 January 2024 to 1 February 2024.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,000 hectares (50.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Nyaungshwe (4,067 ha, 2.7 %); Pinlaung (947 ha, 0.3 %); Pekon (2 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.6 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 28, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Myanmar (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 27. Their median duration was 13 days and their median area 2,937 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 6 of its 27 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 19 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.0 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 1 February 2024 → 8 February 2024.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 19 January 2024 to 1 February 2024. 200 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.