Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Niquelândia fire, 5 October 2017 Niquelândia

Out · last detection 18 Oct 2017, 16:49 UTC

The fire started on 5 October 2017 in Niquelândia, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 14 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,691 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 110th largest in Goiás since 2016 (of 488 with a page). Number 217 in Brazil in 2017, of 994.

The power measured by the satellite is low (26.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
8,691ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
14days
5 Oct 2017 – 18 Oct 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
5 Oct
2017
Heat detections
344
in a single hotspot: 26 MW
Danger at start
42
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
131MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Oct18 Oct
18 Oct 2017

How it evolved, day by day

5 Oct 2017 · 143 MW · 14 6 Oct 2017 · 311 MW · 46 7 Oct 2017 · 414 MW · 78 8 Oct 2017 · 296 MW · 71 9 Oct 2017 · 266 MW · 64 10 Oct 2017 · 166 MW · 24 11 Oct 2017 · 49 MW · 12 12 Oct 2017 · 31 MW · 9 13 Oct 2017 · 11 MW · 2 14 Oct 2017 · 42 MW · 4 15 Oct 2017 · 25 MW · 7 16 Oct 2017 · 6 MW · 1 17 Oct 2017 · 62 MW · 8 18 Oct 2017 · 19 MW · 4
7 Oct 11 Oct 14 Oct 17 Oct

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
44km/h · peak gust
9%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.0 mm on 28 Oct.

This area had burned before

19% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,691 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 5.5% of the area of London (87 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Niquelândia 34,964 inhabitants where it started
    8,734 ha reached on 5 Oct
    0.9 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area0.39 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.39 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Oct 34.5 °C 23 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
6 Oct 36.1 °C 21 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
7 Oct 36.1 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
8 Oct 35.8 °C 11 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
9 Oct 35.5 °C 20 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
10 Oct 37.2 °C 15 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
11 Oct 36.7 °C 10 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
12 Oct 37.6 °C 9 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 59
13 Oct 37.7 °C 11 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
14 Oct 38.7 °C 13 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
15 Oct 37.5 °C 22 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
16 Oct 37.3 °C 21 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
17 Oct 35.8 °C 19 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
18 Oct 34.4 °C 19 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
19 Oct after 35.8 °C 17 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
20 Oct after 35.0 °C 23 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
21 Oct after 36.7 °C 19 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
22 Oct after 37.6 °C 18 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
23 Oct after 37.0 °C 20 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
24 Oct after 37.3 °C 16 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
25 Oct after 38.1 °C 15 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
26 Oct after 37.1 °C 20 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 71
27 Oct after 34.8 °C 32 % 32 km/h 0.3 mm Very high 50
28 Oct after 32.6 °C 35 % 36 km/h 1.0 mm High 28

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 42.1, a minimum humidity of 23% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 30.

FWI at the start 42.1
Minimum humidity 23 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Minaçu fire, October 2022
4,131 ha 10 days FWI 42.8 Min. humidity 22 % 101 km away, in 2022

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.8 mm on 23 Oct.

What happened to them

10 days
median duration
4,706 ha
median area
13 %
went past 10,000 ha
5.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 26 of 30 had it)

It was 1.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 14 days, against 10 days.

Only 5 of its 30 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 30, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.0 mmfirst rain
28 Oct10 days after it ended
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 18 Oct, and on 28 Oct 1.0 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 26 of 30, with a median of 5.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 28 Sept 2017
After · 25 Oct 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 344Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Niquelândia fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 October 2017 and 18 October 2017: 14 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,691 hectares (86.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Niquelândia (8,734 ha, 0.9 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.7 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 66, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 30. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 4,706 ha; 13 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 5 of its 30 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 30, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 344 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.