Skip to content
worldfires
SS · South Sudan · –

Nagero fire, 1 January 2025 Nagero

Out · last detection 20 Jan 2025, 11:44 UTC

The fire started on 1 January 2025 in Nagero, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 20 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,407 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 153th largest in Western Equatoria since 2016 (of 299 with a page). Number 28 in South Sudan in 2025, of 57.

Compare with…
Burnt area
7,407ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
20days
1 Jan 2025 – 20 Jan 2025
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
1 Jan
2025
Heat detections
291
in a single hotspot: 251 MW
Danger at start
54
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
142MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Jan20 Jan
20 Jan 2025

How it evolved, day by day

1 Jan 2025 · 6 MW · 2 2 Jan 2025 · 37 MW · 7 4 Jan 2025 · 41 MW · 11 5 Jan 2025 · 5 MW · 1 6 Jan 2025 · 39 MW · 9 7 Jan 2025 · 20 MW · 14 8 Jan 2025 · 266 MW · 53 9 Jan 2025 · 804 MW · 73 10 Jan 2025 · 675 MW · 71 11 Jan 2025 · 63 MW · 19 12 Jan 2025 · 118 MW · 21 13 Jan 2025 · 21 MW · 4 14 Jan 2025 · 5 MW · 1 17 Jan 2025 · 2 MW · 3 20 Jan 2025 · 21 MW · 2
1 Jan 5 Jan 9 Jan 14 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
40km/h · peak gust
11%lowest humidity

It had gone 45 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

96% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 5,637 ha in 2016, 3,665 ha in 2017, 1,426 ha in 2018, 3,599 ha in 2019, 1,179 ha in 2020, 547 ha in 2021, 1,202 ha in 2022, 1,704 ha in 2023, 1,737 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 7,127 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.7% of the area of London (74 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Nagero where it started
    7,457 ha reached on 1 Jan
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 33 % of the area in South Sudan

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Jan 33.7 °C 12 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
2 Jan 34.6 °C 15 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
3 Jan 35.5 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
4 Jan 37.3 °C 14 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
5 Jan 37.7 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
6 Jan 36.7 °C 13 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
7 Jan 34.9 °C 11 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
8 Jan 35.8 °C 12 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
9 Jan 36.1 °C 11 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
10 Jan 36.7 °C 11 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
11 Jan 35.2 °C 12 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
12 Jan 33.8 °C 14 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
13 Jan 34.3 °C 12 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
14 Jan 35.7 °C 12 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
15 Jan 36.7 °C 11 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
16 Jan 36.8 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
17 Jan 37.8 °C 16 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
18 Jan 38.3 °C 15 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
19 Jan 38.2 °C 14 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
20 Jan 36.5 °C 17 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
21 Jan after 35.5 °C 21 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
22 Jan after 37.6 °C 11 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
23 Jan after 36.8 °C 12 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
24 Jan after 35.9 °C 12 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
25 Jan after 35.7 °C 10 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
26 Jan after 36.1 °C 8 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
27 Jan after 35.6 °C 9 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
28 Jan after 35.4 °C 9 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
29 Jan after 34.8 °C 10 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
30 Jan after 35.3 °C 10 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 54.1, a minimum humidity of 12% and 45 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 45.

FWI at the start 54.1
Minimum humidity 12 %
Days without rain 45
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Wau fire, December 2021
8,316 ha 8 days FWI 53.5 Min. humidity 12 % 51 km away, in 2021

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

14 days
median duration
7,126 ha
median area
22 %
went past 10,000 ha
1.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 2 of 45 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (7,407 ha against a median of 7,126 ha) and lasted 20 days, against 14 days.

In 43 of 45, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
40km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 20 Jan, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 2 of 45, with a median of 1.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Dec 2024
After · 27 Jan 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 8 January 2025 the air beside the fire reached 59 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 43: 2.9 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak59 µg/m³
Days over the guideline11 days
PM1070 µg/m³
Optical depth0.77
6 Jan9 Jan12 Jan15 Jan
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 291Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in South Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Nagero fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 1 January 2025 to 20 January 2025 (20 days). The perimeter dates it from 8 January 2025 to 13 January 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,407 hectares (74.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Nagero (7,457 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.3 °C, humidity dropped to 11 % and gusts hit 40 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 56, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 45. Their median duration was 14 days and their median area 7,126 ha; 22 % went past 10,000 ha. In 43 of 45, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 13 January 2025 → 20 January 2025.
  2. Start date: 8 January 2025 → 1 January 2025.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 8 January 2025 to 13 January 2025. 291 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.