Matupá fire, 27 August 2017 Matupá, Guarantã do Norte, Peixoto de Azevedo
The fire started on 27 August 2017 in Matupá, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 32 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 46,326 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 52th largest in Mato Grosso since 2016 (of 1996 with a page). Number 19 in Brazil in 2017, of 994.
- Burnt area
- 46,326ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 32days
- 27 Aug 2017 – 27 Sept 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 27 Aug
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 2,099
- in a single hotspot: 375 MW
- Danger at start
- 38
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 20.5GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 4.9 mm on 1 Oct.
This area had burned before
6% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,862 ha in 2016.
What happened to each town
-
Matupá where it started36,270 ha reached on 27 Aug6.9 %
-
Guarantã do Norte 20,091 inhabitants9,995 ha reached on 8 Sept2.1 %
-
Peixoto de Azevedo 32,714 inhabitants361 ha reached on 18 Sept0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug | 35.9 °C | 21 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 28 Aug | 36.2 °C | 19 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 29 Aug | 36.2 °C | 19 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 30 Aug | 34.8 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 31 Aug | 36.4 °C | 21 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 1 Sept | 35.7 °C | 22 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 2 Sept | 35.6 °C | 19 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 3 Sept | 34.7 °C | 20 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 4 Sept | 33.5 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 5 Sept | 34.7 °C | 19 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 6 Sept | 34.6 °C | 24 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 7 Sept | 35.4 °C | 25 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 8 Sept | 36.2 °C | 22 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 9 Sept | 35.2 °C | 26 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Sept | 35.3 °C | 28 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 11 Sept | 35.8 °C | 26 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 12 Sept | 36.8 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 13 Sept | 36.4 °C | 17 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 14 Sept | 34.9 °C | 23 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 15 Sept | 36.0 °C | 21 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 16 Sept | 36.1 °C | 16 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 17 Sept | 35.2 °C | 19 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 18 Sept | 35.9 °C | 18 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 19 Sept | 35.8 °C | 20 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 20 Sept | 35.1 °C | 32 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 21 Sept | 29.8 °C | 41 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 22 Sept | 34.3 °C | 30 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 23 Sept | 34.9 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 24 Sept | 34.2 °C | 35 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 25 Sept | 35.3 °C | 27 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 26 Sept | 32.7 °C | 48 % | 32 km/h | 2.6 mm | Low 10 |
| 27 Sept | 34.6 °C | 38 % | 26 km/h | 0.9 mm | High 22 |
| 28 Sept after | 31.8 °C | 45 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 29 Sept after | 35.0 °C | 32 % | 24 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 29 |
| 30 Sept after | 34.2 °C | 41 % | 33 km/h | 6.9 mm | Low 7 |
| 1 Oct after | 27.3 °C | 76 % | 28 km/h | 4.9 mm | Very low 0 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 2,099Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 33,666 haMatupáSeptember 2020 · 20 days · 7 km away
- 24,335 haPeixoto de Azevedo27 August 2022 · 18 days · 20 km away
- 16,435 haPeixoto de Azevedo7 September 2024 · 17 days · 24 km away
- 26,977 haPeixoto de Azevedo1 September 2017 · 20 days · 32 km away
- 32,183 haPeixoto de Azevedo28 August 2024 · 16 days · 36 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Matupá fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 August 2017 and 27 September 2017: 32 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 46,326 hectares (463.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Matupá (36,270 ha, 6.9 %); Guarantã do Norte (9,995 ha, 2.1 %); Peixoto de Azevedo (361 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.8 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.