Lábrea fire, 22 August 2022 Lábrea
The fire started on 22 August 2022 in Lábrea, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 19 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,053 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 116th largest in Amazonas since 2016 (of 450 with a page). Number 230 in Brazil in 2022, of 687.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Lábrea · 2024Lábrea · 2021Lábrea · 2019Lábrea · 2020
- Burnt area
- 6,053ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 19days
- 22 Aug 2022 – 9 Sept 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 22 Aug
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 490
- in a single hotspot: 174 MW
- Danger at start
- 19
- Moderate · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 396MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 2 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 6.8 mm on 11 Sept.
This area had burned before
17% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,031 ha in 2021.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
6,103 ha reached on 24 Aug0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug | 33.7 °C | 32 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 23 Aug | 34.8 °C | 31 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 24 Aug | 35.7 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 25 Aug | 35.1 °C | 32 % | 16 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 26 Aug | 33.8 °C | 46 % | 23 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 27 Aug | 34.5 °C | 45 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 28 Aug | 31.4 °C | 57 % | 26 km/h | 7.6 mm | Very low 2 |
| 29 Aug | 30.0 °C | 43 % | 41 km/h | 0.1 mm | Low 9 |
| 30 Aug | 33.2 °C | 34 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 31 Aug | 34.2 °C | 36 % | 15 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 1 Sept | 36.2 °C | 32 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 2 Sept | 36.2 °C | 33 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 3 Sept | 34.8 °C | 39 % | 29 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 23 |
| 4 Sept | 33.9 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 5 Sept | 34.7 °C | 29 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 6 Sept | 36.0 °C | 25 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 7 Sept | 35.9 °C | 32 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 8 Sept | 36.7 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 29 |
| 9 Sept | 36.5 °C | 39 % | 26 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 27 |
| 10 Sept after | 35.9 °C | 43 % | 20 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 24 |
| 11 Sept after | 30.3 °C | 57 % | 24 km/h | 6.8 mm | Very low 2 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 26 August 2022 the air beside the fire reached 1,628 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 863: 58 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 490Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 42,438 haLábrea2 August 2024 · 40 days · 5 km away
- 41,632 haLábrea28 July 2021 · 34 days · 20 km away
- 14,628 haLábrea29 July 2019 · 23 days · 22 km away
- 15,510 haLábrea7 August 2020 · 20 days · 25 km away
- 35,986 haLábrea14 August 2022 · 28 days · 29 km away
- 14,695 haLábrea31 July 2019 · 24 days · 36 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Lábrea fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 22 August 2022 and 9 September 2022: 19 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,053 hectares (60.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Lábrea (6,103 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.7 °C, humidity dropped to 25 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 30, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 490 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.