Lábrea fire, 12 August 2022 Lábrea
The fire started on 12 August 2022 in Lábrea, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 16 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,260 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 67th largest in Amazonas since 2016 (of 450 with a page). Number 157 in Brazil in 2022, of 687.
- Burnt area
- 8,260ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 16days
- 12 Aug 2022 – 27 Aug 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 12 Aug
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 1,092
- in a single hotspot: 1,385 MW
- Danger at start
- 14
- Moderate · FWI index
- Energy released
- 30.0GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 6.2 mm on 11 Sept.
This area had burned before
36% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 823 ha in 2019, 2,256 ha in 2020, 3,660 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,011 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
8,329 ha reached on 12 Aug0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug | 33.4 °C | 38 % | 13 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 13 Aug | 34.9 °C | 34 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 14 Aug | 35.2 °C | 40 % | 22 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 15 Aug | 33.8 °C | 45 % | 31 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 16 Aug | 33.8 °C | 44 % | 37 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 17 Aug | 35.3 °C | 41 % | 39 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 23 |
| 18 Aug | 35.6 °C | 39 % | 26 km/h | 1.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 19 Aug | 25.7 °C | 59 % | 55 km/h | 14.6 mm | Very low 2 |
| 20 Aug | 26.9 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 8 |
| 21 Aug | 30.6 °C | 33 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 22 Aug | 33.5 °C | 31 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 23 Aug | 34.6 °C | 31 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 24 Aug | 35.5 °C | 29 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 25 Aug | 35.3 °C | 30 % | 16 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 26 Aug | 33.9 °C | 45 % | 23 km/h | 0.4 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 27 Aug | 34.5 °C | 45 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 28 Aug after | 32.3 °C | 52 % | 26 km/h | 3.5 mm | Very low 4 |
| 29 Aug after | 29.7 °C | 42 % | 41 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 30 Aug after | 33.1 °C | 33 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 31 Aug after | 34.2 °C | 35 % | 15 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 1 Sept after | 36.2 °C | 30 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 2 Sept after | 36.5 °C | 31 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 3 Sept after | 34.4 °C | 39 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 4 Sept after | 33.7 °C | 33 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 5 Sept after | 34.5 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 6 Sept after | 35.9 °C | 24 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 7 Sept after | 35.9 °C | 31 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 8 Sept after | 36.5 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 31 |
| 9 Sept after | 36.5 °C | 38 % | 26 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 30 |
| 10 Sept after | 36.0 °C | 42 % | 21 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 27 |
| 11 Sept after | 28.6 °C | 59 % | 24 km/h | 6.2 mm | Very low 2 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 26 August 2022 the air beside the fire reached 1,628 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 863: 58 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1,092Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 43,699 haLábrea13 July 2024 · 54 days · 15 km away
- 41,632 haLábrea28 July 2021 · 34 days · 18 km away
- 35,986 haLábrea14 August 2022 · 28 days · 19 km away
- 15,510 haLábrea7 August 2020 · 20 days · 21 km away
- 14,628 haLábrea29 July 2019 · 23 days · 22 km away
- 26,762 haLábrea9 August 2022 · 33 days · 32 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Lábrea fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 12 August 2022 and 27 August 2022: 16 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,260 hectares (82.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Lábrea (8,329 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.5 °C, humidity dropped to 29 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 26, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.