Hakha fire, January 2026 Gangaw, Matupi, Hakha
The fire started on 29 January 2026 in Hakha, Myanmar, and satellites saw it burning for 33 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 9,334 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 21th largest in Chin since 2016 (of 242 with a page). Number 55 in Myanmar in 2026, of 480.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Gangaw · 2023Gangaw · 2016Gangaw · 2020Gangaw · 2019
- Burnt area
- 9,334ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 33days
- 29 Jan 2026 – 2 Mar 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 29 Jan
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 306
- in a single hotspot: 36 MW
- Danger at start
- 12
- Moderate · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 38MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 12 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
97% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,481 ha in 2016, 2,966 ha in 2017, 2,439 ha in 2019, 3,433 ha in 2020, 842 ha in 2021, 1,029 ha in 2022, 6,499 ha in 2023, 1,805 ha in 2024, 1,641 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 9,010 ha that had burned before.
- 6,499 ha Gangaw fire, January 2023 13,643 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,995 ha Gangaw fire, February 2016 4,111 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,576 ha Gangaw fire, February 2020 3,575 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,365 ha Gangaw fire, February 2019 3,150 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,132 ha Tilin fire, February 2024 13,183 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 515 ha Hakha fire, March 2016 2,706 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 383 ha Tilin fire, February 2017 3,544 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 44 ha Gangaw fire, February 2016 4,326 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
3,936 ha reached on 29 Jan1.6 %
-
3,302 ha reached on 7 Feb0.6 %
-
Hakha where it started2,137 ha reached on 29 Jan0.5 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Jan | 28.9 °C | 47 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 30 Jan | 28.9 °C | 52 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 31 Jan | 28.3 °C | 54 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 1 Feb | 28.6 °C | 55 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 2 Feb | 27.5 °C | 57 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 3 Feb | 27.7 °C | 58 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 4 Feb | 27.7 °C | 57 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 5 Feb | 29.5 °C | 45 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 6 Feb | 28.1 °C | 53 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 7 Feb | 29.0 °C | 49 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 8 Feb | 28.9 °C | 51 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 9 Feb | 28.7 °C | 48 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 10 Feb | 29.9 °C | 39 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 11 Feb | 29.8 °C | 43 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 12 Feb | 29.5 °C | 43 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 13 Feb | 29.4 °C | 43 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 14 Feb | 30.1 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 15 Feb | 30.1 °C | 43 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 16 Feb | 30.0 °C | 41 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 17 Feb | 30.0 °C | 42 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 18 Feb | 31.2 °C | 39 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 19 Feb | 31.8 °C | 41 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 20 Feb | 32.4 °C | 47 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 21 Feb | 33.2 °C | 35 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 22 Feb | 32.1 °C | 33 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 23 Feb | 31.0 °C | 36 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 24 Feb | 30.1 °C | 40 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 25 Feb | 30.8 °C | 38 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 26 Feb | 30.2 °C | 39 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 27 Feb | 29.9 °C | 42 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 28 Feb | 31.8 °C | 35 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 1 Mar | 32.1 °C | 30 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 2 Mar | 31.3 °C | 37 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 3 Mar after | 29.6 °C | 45 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 4 Mar after | 29.0 °C | 51 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 5 Mar after | 31.7 °C | 40 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 6 Mar after | 32.0 °C | 40 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 7 Mar after | 33.7 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 8 Mar after | 34.1 °C | 38 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 9 Mar after | 33.7 °C | 39 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 10 Mar after | 34.1 °C | 31 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 11 Mar after | 34.2 °C | 37 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 12 Mar after | 33.0 °C | 42 % | 20 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 23 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 27 February 2026 the air beside the fire reached 58 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 40: 2.6 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 306Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 13,643 haGangawJanuary 2023 · 24 days · 1 km away
- 12,588 haHakha15 February 2021 · 23 days · 13 km away
- 11,026 haHakha14 February 2026 · 22 days · 20 km away
- 11,583 haTilinFebruary 2019 · 22 days · 22 km away
- 13,183 haTilinFebruary 2024 · 24 days · 23 km away
- 12,329 haHakha4 April 2023 · 25 days · 29 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Hakha fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 29 January 2026 to 2 March 2026 (33 days). The perimeter dates it from 5 February 2026 to 24 February 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 9,334 hectares (93.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Gangaw (3,936 ha, 1.6 %); Matupi (3,302 ha, 0.6 %); Hakha (2,137 ha, 0.5 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.2 °C, humidity dropped to 30 % and gusts hit 29 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 27, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Myanmar (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 24 February 2026 → 2 March 2026.
- Start date: 5 February 2026 → 29 January 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 5 February 2026 to 24 February 2026. 306 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.