Skip to content
worldfires
TR · Türkiye · →

Gülnar fire, September 2022 Silifke, Gülnar

Out · last detection 8 Sept 2022, 10:30 UTC

The fire started on 7 September 2022 in Gülnar, Türkiye, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 2,780 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 4th largest in Mersin since 2016 (of 16 with a page). Number 2 in Türkiye in 2022, of 23.

Compare with…
Burnt area
2,780ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
2days
7 Sept 2022 – 8 Sept 2022
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
7 Sept
2022
Heat detections
112
in a single hotspot: 120 MW
Danger at start
51
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
1.3GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 7 Sept8 Sept
8 Sept 2022

How it evolved, day by day

7 Sept 2022 · 2,484 MW · 105 8 Sept 2022 · 152 MW · 7
7 Sept 8 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
45km/h · peak gust
19%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.0 mm on 13 Sept.

This area had burned before

0% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3 ha in 2021.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.8% of the area of London (28 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Silifke 119,303 inhabitants · 34.7 km from the centre
    1,669 ha reached on 7 Sept
    0.6 %
  2. Gülnar 25,865 inhabitants · 20.6 km from the centre where it started
    1,103 ha reached on 7 Sept
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland53 %
  • Coniferous forest39 %
  • Agricultural areas6.5 %
  • Other natural land1.4 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area1.2 ha
Residents≈ 100

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.2 hectares of built-up land and about 100 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Sept 31.1 °C 21 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
8 Sept 30.5 °C 19 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
9 Sept after 30.8 °C 27 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
10 Sept after 31.0 °C 31 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
11 Sept after 29.1 °C 35 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
12 Sept after 28.1 °C 57 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
13 Sept after 28.0 °C 48 % 32 km/h 1.0 mm Moderate 20

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Aug 2022
After · 15 Sept 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 9 September 2022 the air beside the fire reached 138 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 52: 3.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak138 µg/m³
Days over the guideline6 days
PM1026 µg/m³
Optical depth0.63
567891011
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 112Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Türkiye ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Gülnar fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 7 September 2022 and 8 September 2022: 2 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 2,780 hectares (27.8 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Silifke (1,669 ha, 0.6 %); Gülnar (1,103 ha, 0.8 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Gülnar and came within 20.6 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 31.1 °C, humidity dropped to 19 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 53, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Türkiye (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 112 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.