Skip to content
worldfires
CU · Cuba · –

Camajuaní fire, April 2025 Camajuaní

Out · last detection 17 Apr 2025, 18:03 UTC

The fire started on 15 April 2025 in Camajuaní, Cuba, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,232 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 9th largest in Villa Clara since 2016 (of 16 with a page). Number 18 in Cuba in 2025, of 27.

Burnt area
1,232ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
3days
15 Apr 2025 – 17 Apr 2025
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
15 Apr
2025
Heat detections
29
in a single hotspot: 84 MW
Danger at start
11
Low · FWI index
Average daily power
111MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 15 Apr17 Apr
17 Apr 2025

How it evolved, day by day

15 Apr 2025 · 10 MW · 3 16 Apr 2025 · 135 MW · 14 17 Apr 2025 · 188 MW · 12
15 Apr 16 Apr 17 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

28°high
39km/h · peak gust
55%lowest humidity

It had gone 2 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.9 mm on 19 Apr.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.8% of the area of London (12 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Camajuaní where it started
    1,238 ha reached on 15 Apr
    2.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
15 Apr 27.6 °C 55 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Low 11
16 Apr 26.7 °C 55 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 11
17 Apr 27.2 °C 60 % 39 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 14
18 Apr after 27.3 °C 57 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
19 Apr after 26.2 °C 67 % 58 km/h 2.9 mm Low 6

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 10.9, a minimum humidity of 55% and 2 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 20.

FWI at the start 10.9
Minimum humidity 55 %
Days without rain 2
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Camajuaní fire, March 2025
2,015 ha 8 days FWI 8.0 Min. humidity 54 % 5 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.9 mm on 14 Mar.

What happened to them

6 days
median duration
1,345 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 17 of 20 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,232 ha against a median of 1,345 ha) and lasted 3 days, against 6 days.

In 3 of 20, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.9 mmfirst rain
19 Apr2 days after it ended
39km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 17 Apr, and on 19 Apr 2.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 17 of 20, with a median of 2.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 8 Apr 2025
After · 24 Apr 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 19 April 2025 the air beside the fire reached 9 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak9 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1014 µg/m³
Optical depth0.22
13 Apr15 Apr17 Apr19 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 29Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cuba

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Camajuaní fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 15 April 2025 and 17 April 2025: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,232 hectares (12.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Camajuaní (1,238 ha, 2.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 27.6 °C, humidity dropped to 55 % and gusts hit 39 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 14, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cuba (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 20. Their median duration was 6 days and their median area 1,345 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 3 of 20, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 105 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 105.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 29 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.