Burned area
satellite only1,045ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 5 Jul 2022 – 26 Jul 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
IQ · Iraq · –
Al-Kahla fire, 5 July 2022 Al-Kahla
Out · last detection 26 Jul 2022, 22:26 UTC
The fire started on 5 July 2022 in Al-Kahla, Iraq, and satellites saw it burning for 22 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,045 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 27th largest in Maysan since 2016 (of 29 with a page). Number 12 in Iraq in 2022, of 12.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-27matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only22days
5 Jul 2022 to 26 Jul 2022: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 26 Jul 2022, 22:26 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only5 Jul 2022
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 5 Jul 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only101
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 57 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP + NOAA-20)
- Date
- 5 Jul 2022 – 26 Jul 2022
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only516MW
Total radiative power on 20 July 2022; hotspots that day: 27.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 20 Jul 2022
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model104.2FWI · very extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 5 Jul 2022, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model51.2°C · 9% RH
High of 51.2 °C and minimum humidity of 9% on 19 July 2022; gusts of 69 km/h on 23 July 2022.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 5 Jul 2022 – 26 Jul 2022
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logStart date: 12 July 2022 → 5 July 2022.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 27 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 1,045 ha
- Dates
- 5 Jul 2022 – 26 Jul 2022
- Name
- Al-Kahla
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/al-kahla-2022-07-2?v=2026-10-27A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire al-kahla-2022-07-2.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-05 | 2 | 71 | 47.5 | 32.6 | 9 | 22.6 | 43.9 | 0 | 104.2 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-06 | 0 | 0 | 47.6 | 32.3 | 9 | 19.1 | 36.7 | 0 | 89.9 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-07 | 7 | 17 | 47.3 | 32.6 | 9 | 16.6 | 35.3 | 0 | 79.2 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-08 | 18 | 124 | 47.6 | 31.8 | 8 | 25.1 | 43.6 | 0 | 98.4 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-09 | 1 | 2 | 47.2 | 32.4 | 10 | 24.6 | 43.9 | 0 | 101.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-10 | 0 | 0 | 48.6 | 33.7 | 11 | 26.7 | 49.3 | 0 | 113.2 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-11 | 0 | 0 | 46.1 | 33.8 | 13 | 24 | 43.6 | 0 | 91.1 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-12 | 3 | 23 | 45.8 | 32.4 | 13 | 23.8 | 47.2 | 0 | 102.9 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-13 | 0 | 0 | 47.9 | 32.3 | 9 | 22.5 | 45.7 | 0 | 100.6 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-14 | 2 | 5 | 48.6 | 33.9 | 10 | 24.1 | 43.2 | 0 | 83.9 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-15 | 2 | 6 | 48.9 | 32.5 | 10 | 20.5 | 33.1 | 0 | 57.7 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-16 | 3 | 50 | 49.5 | 32.8 | 9 | 18.3 | 29.5 | 0 | 60.1 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-17 | 11 | 89 | 49.7 | 33.9 | 9 | 19.4 | 33.5 | 0 | 85.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-18 | 1 | 3 | 50.6 | 32.9 | 8 | 19 | 38.9 | 0 | 98.3 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-19 | 0 | 0 | 51.2 | 34 | 9 | 21.2 | 41.4 | 0 | 103.2 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-20 | 27 | 516 | 50 | 35.7 | 11 | 21.3 | 41.4 | 0 | 87 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-21 | 0 | 0 | 47.3 | 33 | 10 | 16.9 | 29.9 | 0 | 61.1 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-22 | 1 | 4 | 49.5 | 34.1 | 10 | 27 | 46.8 | 0 | 80.2 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-23 | 2 | 3 | 47.8 | 33.8 | 8 | 38 | 68.8 | 0 | 164 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-24 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 30.5 | 8 | 34.7 | 60.8 | 0 | 142.1 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-25 | 3 | 1 | 46.1 | 29.8 | 7 | 25.2 | 47.2 | 0 | 107.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-26 | 18 | 404 | 47 | 29.6 | 7 | 28.3 | 50 | 0 | 117.5 | muy_extremo | 1 |
| 2022-07-27 | 0 | 0 | 47.1 | 30.6 | 7 | 25.1 | 43.9 | 0 | 104.8 | muy_extremo | 0 |
| 2022-07-28 | 0 | 0 | 45.1 | 29 | 12 | 15.8 | 27.4 | 0 | 52.3 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-07-29 | 0 | 0 | 43.6 | 32 | 33 | 21.6 | 39.6 | 0.2 | 59.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-07-30 | 0 | 0 | 44.4 | 33.9 | 27 | 21.2 | 33.8 | 0 | 43.3 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-07-31 | 0 | 0 | 45.6 | 32.9 | 20 | 19.4 | 34.6 | 0 | 45.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-08-01 | 0 | 0 | 46.1 | 33.4 | 24 | 18.8 | 32.4 | 0 | 50.5 | extremo | 0 |
| 2022-08-02 | 0 | 0 | 46.4 | 34.2 | 24 | 13 | 26.3 | 0 | 44.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-08-03 | 0 | 0 | 48.1 | 36.1 | 20 | 12.8 | 19.1 | 1.3 | 43.4 | muy_alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 1,045ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 22days
- 5 Jul 2022 – 26 Jul 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 5 Jul
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 101
- in a single hotspot: 57 MW
- Danger at start
- 104
- Very extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 88MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
5 Jul26 Jul
26 Jul 2022
How it evolved, day by day
5 Jul
9 Jul
15 Jul
20 Jul
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
51°high
69km/h · peak gust
7%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.3 mm on 3 Aug.
This area had burned before
78% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 688 ha in 2018, 412 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 818 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Al-Kahla where it started1,046 ha reached on 5 Jul0.3 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with Very dry air: 69 % of the area in Iraq 60 days without rain: 27 % of the area in Iraq
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jul | 47.5 °C | 9 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 104 |
| 6 Jul | 47.6 °C | 9 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 90 |
| 7 Jul | 47.3 °C | 9 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 79 |
| 8 Jul | 47.6 °C | 8 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 98 |
| 9 Jul | 47.2 °C | 10 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 102 |
| 10 Jul | 48.6 °C | 11 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 113 |
| 11 Jul | 46.1 °C | 13 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 91 |
| 12 Jul | 45.8 °C | 13 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 103 |
| 13 Jul | 47.9 °C | 9 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 101 |
| 14 Jul | 48.6 °C | 10 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 84 |
| 15 Jul | 48.9 °C | 10 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 16 Jul | 49.5 °C | 9 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 17 Jul | 49.7 °C | 9 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 86 |
| 18 Jul | 50.6 °C | 8 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 98 |
| 19 Jul | 51.2 °C | 9 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 103 |
| 20 Jul | 50.0 °C | 11 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 87 |
| 21 Jul | 47.3 °C | 10 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 22 Jul | 49.5 °C | 10 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 80 |
| 23 Jul | 47.8 °C | 8 % | 69 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 164 |
| 24 Jul | 47.0 °C | 8 % | 61 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 142 |
| 25 Jul | 46.1 °C | 7 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 108 |
| 26 Jul | 47.0 °C | 7 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 118 |
| 27 Jul after | 47.1 °C | 7 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 105 |
| 28 Jul after | 45.1 °C | 12 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 29 Jul after | 43.6 °C | 33 % | 40 km/h | 0.2 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 30 Jul after | 44.4 °C | 27 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 31 Jul after | 45.6 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 1 Aug after | 46.1 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 2 Aug after | 46.4 °C | 24 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 3 Aug after | 48.1 °C | 20 % | 19 km/h | 1.3 mm | Very high 43 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 104.2, a minimum humidity of 9% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 3.
FWI at the start
104.2
Minimum humidity
9 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Al-Kahla fire, 5 July 2022
1,045 ha
22 days
FWI 104.2
Min. humidity 9 %
Al-Kahla fire, June 2021
1,456 ha
2 days
FWI 103.5
Min. humidity 8 %
3 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Al-Chibayish fire, July 2018
1,048 ha
5 days
FWI 110.2
Min. humidity 10 %
97 km away, in 2018
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Dasht-e-Azadegan fire, June 2018
1,028 ha
1 day
FWI 107.5
Min. humidity 11 %
29 km away, in 2018
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 3. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.3 mmfirst rain
3 Aug8 days after it ended
69km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 26 Jul, and on 3 Aug 1.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 28 Jun 2022
After · 2 Aug 2022
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 101Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 13,270 haAl-KahlaJune 2018 · 69 days · 8 km away
- 5,834 haAl-Kahla13 July 2022 · 22 days · 13 km away
- 3,563 haAl-Kahla14 March 2025 · 12 days · 14 km away
- 2,797 haAl-Kahla15 March 2018 · 3 days · 15 km away
- 3,138 haAl-KahlaJanuary 2016 · 3 days · 16 km away
- 2,798 haAl-KahlaAugust 2021 · 22 days · 17 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Al-Kahla fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 5 July 2022 to 26 July 2022 (22 days). The perimeter dates it from 12 July 2022 to 26 July 2022.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,045 hectares (10.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Al-Kahla (1,046 ha, 0.3 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 51.2 °C, humidity dropped to 7 % and gusts hit 69 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 164, class Very extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Iraq (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Start date: 12 July 2022 → 5 July 2022.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 12 July 2022 to 26 July 2022. 101 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.