Skip to content
worldfires
SS · South Sudan · –

Wulu fire, 21 January 2022 Wulu

Out · last detection 27 Jan 2022, 22:59 UTC

The fire started on 21 January 2022 in Wulu, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,042 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 118th largest in Lakes since 2016 (of 158 with a page). Number 91 in South Sudan in 2022, of 124.

Compare with…
Burnt area
6,042ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
7days
21 Jan 2022 – 27 Jan 2022
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
21 Jan
2022
Heat detections
161
in a single hotspot: 116 MW
Danger at start
44
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
246MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 21 Jan27 Jan
27 Jan 2022

How it evolved, day by day

21 Jan 2022 · 663 MW · 27 22 Jan 2022 · 51 MW · 15 23 Jan 2022 · 649 MW · 42 24 Jan 2022 · 242 MW · 52 25 Jan 2022 · 2 MW · 2 26 Jan 2022 · 109 MW · 20 27 Jan 2022 · 9 MW · 3
21 Jan 23 Jan 25 Jan 27 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
45km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity

It had gone 3 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

100% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 8,040 ha in 2016, 1,301 ha in 2017, 237 ha in 2018, 5 ha in 2019, 5,959 ha in 2020, 1,571 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 6,029 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.8% of the area of London (60 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Wulu where it started
    6,078 ha reached on 21 Jan
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents≈ 30

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.00 hectares of built-up land and about 30 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
21 Jan 33.6 °C 14 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
22 Jan 34.4 °C 16 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
23 Jan 34.9 °C 20 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
24 Jan 35.9 °C 17 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
25 Jan 37.0 °C 15 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
26 Jan 36.3 °C 15 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
27 Jan 35.3 °C 15 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
28 Jan after 33.5 °C 16 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
29 Jan after 34.5 °C 13 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
30 Jan after 34.4 °C 11 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
31 Jan after 35.7 °C 11 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
1 Feb after 34.7 °C 12 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
2 Feb after 36.5 °C 13 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
3 Feb after 38.1 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
4 Feb after 37.0 °C 15 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
5 Feb after 34.0 °C 12 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
6 Feb after 33.4 °C 11 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 14 Jan 2022
After · 3 Feb 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 161Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in South Sudan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Wulu fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 21 January 2022 and 27 January 2022: 7 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,042 hectares (60.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Wulu (6,078 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.0 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 51, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 161 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.