Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain · →

Viana do Bolo fire, September 2017 Viana do Bolo

Out · last detection 24 Sept 2017, 12:51 UTC

The fire started on 24 September 2017 in Viana do Bolo, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 364 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 23 September 2017 at 20:44 and declared extinguished on 25 September 2017.

It is the 54th largest in Ourense since 2016 (of 118 with a page). Number 69 in Spain in 2017, of 144.

Compare with…
Burnt area
364ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
24 Sept 2017 – 24 Sept 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
24 Sept
2017
Heat detections
16
in a single hotspot: 96 MW
Danger at start
21
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
752MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 24 Sept24 Sept

How it evolved, day by day

24 Sept 2017 · 752 MW · 16

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

20°high
37km/h · peak gust
25%lowest humidity

It had gone 24 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Viana do Bolo 2,715 inhabitants · 7.4 km from the centre where it started
    364 ha reached on 24 Sept
    1.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land100 %

Natura 2000 protected area affected: 100 %

Natura 2000 sites (European Environment Agency, 2024 release) crossed by the perimeter.

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

Official record

According to EGIF (MITECO), this fire started on 23 September 2017 and burned 329 ha (the satellite measured 364 ha).

MITECO, Estadística General de Incendios Forestales (EGIF). This is the agency’s consolidated statistic: it measures the area in its own way, which is why it can differ from the satellite.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
24 Sept 19.5 °C 25 % 37 km/h 0.4 mm Moderate 21
25 Sept after 16.3 °C 44 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
26 Sept after 18.7 °C 35 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
27 Sept after 20.1 °C 43 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
28 Sept after 21.1 °C 31 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
29 Sept after 19.4 °C 44 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
30 Sept after 17.7 °C 45 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
1 Oct after 20.9 °C 40 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
2 Oct after 23.8 °C 38 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
3 Oct after 23.4 °C 27 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
4 Oct after 23.0 °C 29 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 21

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 17 Sept 2017
After · 1 Oct 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 24 September 2017 the air beside the fire reached 15 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak15 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1018 µg/m³
222324252627
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 16Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Viana do Bolo fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 24 September 2017 and 24 September 2017: 1 day between the first and last image with fire. According to EGIF (MITECO), it was detected on 23 September 2017 at 20:44 and declared extinguished on 25 September 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 364 hectares (3.6 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Viana do Bolo (364 ha, 1.4 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Viana do Bolo and came within 7.4 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 19.5 °C, humidity dropped to 25 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 21, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 16 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 329 official ha against 364 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.