Ulang fire, 5 March 2022 Nyirol, Ulang
The fire started on 5 March 2022 in Ulang, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 30 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 47,573 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 7th largest in Upper Nile since 2016 (of 285 with a page). Number 5 in South Sudan in 2022, of 124.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Ulang · 2021Nyirol · 2016Ulang · 2016Ulang · 2017
- Burnt area
- 47,573ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 30days
- 5 Mar 2022 – 3 Apr 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- counties
- Started on
- 5 Mar
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 3,090
- in a single hotspot: 0 MW
- Danger at start
- 62
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 1.2GW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.6 mm on 4 Apr.
This area had burned before
85% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 19,248 ha in 2016, 18,456 ha in 2017, 10,557 ha in 2018, 32,787 ha in 2019, 3,144 ha in 2020, 16,603 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 40,366 ha that had burned before.
- 11,572 ha Ulang fire, March 2021 13,943 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 6,772 ha Nyirol fire, February 2016 7,633 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 6,131 ha Ulang fire, January 2016 11,109 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,744 ha Ulang fire, February 2017 5,531 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,891 ha Ulang fire, February 2019 7,409 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 898 ha Nyirol fire, January 2016 5,988 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
25,877 ha3.6 %
-
Ulang where it started22,020 ha4.5 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there were about 0.08 hectares of built-up land and about 150 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Mar | 42.2 °C | 9 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 6 Mar | 41.6 °C | 12 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 7 Mar | 42.1 °C | 14 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 8 Mar | 42.2 °C | 15 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 9 Mar | 41.3 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 10 Mar | 41.8 °C | 15 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 11 Mar | 41.4 °C | 9 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 12 Mar | 40.5 °C | 12 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 13 Mar | 40.6 °C | 12 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 14 Mar | 40.8 °C | 11 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 15 Mar | 40.0 °C | 10 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 73 |
| 16 Mar | 37.9 °C | 9 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 80 |
| 17 Mar | 37.8 °C | 9 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 72 |
| 18 Mar | 38.2 °C | 11 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 19 Mar | 40.0 °C | 9 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 63 |
| 20 Mar | 40.5 °C | 8 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 21 Mar | 41.4 °C | 7 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 22 Mar | 42.3 °C | 6 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 23 Mar | 39.3 °C | 18 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 24 Mar | 40.8 °C | 12 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 25 Mar | 41.3 °C | 8 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 26 Mar | 40.4 °C | 8 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 76 |
| 27 Mar | 39.5 °C | 7 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 71 |
| 28 Mar | 39.3 °C | 9 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 29 Mar | 39.9 °C | 8 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 30 Mar | 40.9 °C | 10 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 31 Mar | 40.7 °C | 18 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 1 Apr | 41.3 °C | 16 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 2 Apr | 40.7 °C | 17 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 3 Apr | 39.9 °C | 23 % | 50 km/h | 0.1 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 4 Apr after | 40.0 °C | 23 % | 48 km/h | 1.6 mm | Very high 49 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ulang fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 March 2022 and 3 April 2022: 30 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 47,573 hectares (475.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Nyirol (25,877 ha, 3.6 %); Ulang (22,020 ha, 4.5 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 42.3 °C, humidity dropped to 6 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 80, class Very extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 5 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 10 April 2022 → 3 April 2022.
- Start date: 26 February 2022 → 5 March 2022.
- Name: Nyirol → Ulang.
- Last day with fire: 3 April 2022 → 10 April 2022.
- Start date: 5 March 2022 → 26 February 2022.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.