Ulang fire, April 2018 Ulang
The fire started on 23 April 2018 in Ulang, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 12 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,320 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 256th largest in Upper Nile since 2016 (of 284 with a page). Number 106 in South Sudan in 2018, of 120.
- Burnt area
- 5,320ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 12days
- 23 Apr 2018 – 4 May 2018
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- counties
- Started on
- 23 Apr
- 2018
- Heat detections
- 132
- in a single hotspot: 79 MW
- Danger at start
- 30
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 1.6GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 6 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 5 May.
This area had burned before
88% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,988 ha in 2016, 6,747 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,655 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Ulang where it started5,352 ha reached on 23 Apr1.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Apr | 36.6 °C | 35 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 24 Apr | 37.5 °C | 29 % | 41 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Apr | 39.4 °C | 26 % | 40 km/h | 0.6 mm | Very high 38 |
| 26 Apr | 37.5 °C | 28 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 27 Apr | 35.7 °C | 35 % | 37 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 34 |
| 28 Apr | 37.5 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 29 Apr | 37.7 °C | 31 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 30 Apr | 38.2 °C | 26 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 1 May | 39.0 °C | 28 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 2 May | 37.8 °C | 32 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 3 May | 40.4 °C | 22 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 4 May | 40.8 °C | 22 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 5 May after | 40.7 °C | 26 % | 49 km/h | 1.1 mm | Very high 48 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 132Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 83,713 haUlang6 March 2022 · 30 days · 7 km away
- 58,283 haUlangJanuary 2019 · 26 days · 19 km away
- 129,779 haUlangDecember 2016 · 40 days · 25 km away
- 34,778 haLuakpiny/NasirJanuary 2017 · 15 days · 26 km away
- 35,904 haUlangDecember 2017 · 17 days · 28 km away
- 63,860 haAkobo24 January 2022 · 30 days · 34 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ulang fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 23 April 2018 and 4 May 2018: 12 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,320 hectares (53.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Ulang (5,352 ha, 1.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 40.8 °C, humidity dropped to 22 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 59, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.