Akobo fire, 24 January 2022 Ulang, Akobo, Nyirol
The fire started on 24 January 2022 in Akobo, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 30 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 63,860 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 4th largest in Jonglei since 2016 (of 427 with a page). Number 4 in South Sudan in 2022, of 124.
- Burnt area
- 63,860ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 30days
- 24 Jan 2022 – 22 Feb 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- counties
- Started on
- 24 Jan
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 2,821
- in a single hotspot: 175 MW
- Danger at start
- 60
- Extreme · FWI index
- Energy released
- 21.5GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
74% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 14,517 ha in 2016, 21,419 ha in 2017, 26,108 ha in 2018, 11,837 ha in 2019, 2,301 ha in 2020, 128 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 46,944 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
34,339 ha reached on 4 Feb7.1 %
-
Akobo where it started29,945 ha reached on 24 Jan3.3 %
-
14 ha reached on 31 Jan0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jan | 37.6 °C | 12 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 25 Jan | 38.5 °C | 13 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 26 Jan | 38.2 °C | 16 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 27 Jan | 36.6 °C | 18 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 70 |
| 28 Jan | 35.5 °C | 18 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 29 Jan | 35.7 °C | 18 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 30 Jan | 36.0 °C | 17 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 31 Jan | 37.3 °C | 13 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 1 Feb | 36.6 °C | 10 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 2 Feb | 37.7 °C | 15 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 3 Feb | 39.0 °C | 12 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 4 Feb | 39.7 °C | 11 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 5 Feb | 36.6 °C | 11 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 74 |
| 6 Feb | 35.3 °C | 13 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 7 Feb | 35.7 °C | 12 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 8 Feb | 37.6 °C | 11 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 64 |
| 9 Feb | 38.6 °C | 12 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 10 Feb | 38.8 °C | 16 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 11 Feb | 39.2 °C | 12 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 70 |
| 12 Feb | 38.9 °C | 17 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 13 Feb | 39.9 °C | 15 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 14 Feb | 39.5 °C | 10 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 15 Feb | 39.1 °C | 12 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 16 Feb | 39.9 °C | 12 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 17 Feb | 39.9 °C | 10 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 18 Feb | 40.3 °C | 10 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 19 Feb | 40.1 °C | 6 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 79 |
| 20 Feb | 38.3 °C | 6 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 84 |
| 21 Feb | 34.7 °C | 9 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 22 Feb | 37.8 °C | 9 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 23 Feb after | 39.2 °C | 9 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 24 Feb after | 40.6 °C | 8 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 67 |
| 25 Feb after | 39.9 °C | 6 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 70 |
| 26 Feb after | 39.4 °C | 6 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 27 Feb after | 40.5 °C | 9 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 28 Feb after | 40.9 °C | 9 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 69 |
| 1 Mar after | 39.5 °C | 22 % | 41 km/h | 0.3 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 2 Mar after | 40.5 °C | 18 % | 37 km/h | 0.2 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 3 Mar after | 40.0 °C | 18 % | 49 km/h | 0.1 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 4 Mar after | 40.1 °C | 16 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 2,821Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 77,472 haNyirol4 January 2024 · 28 days · 17 km away
- 32,732 haUlang16 February 2025 · 32 days · 17 km away
- 35,904 haUlangDecember 2017 · 17 days · 21 km away
- 129,779 haUlangDecember 2016 · 40 days · 22 km away
- 58,283 haUlangJanuary 2019 · 26 days · 23 km away
- 83,713 haUlang6 March 2022 · 30 days · 28 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Akobo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 January 2022 and 22 February 2022: 30 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 63,860 hectares (638.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Ulang (34,339 ha, 7.1 %); Akobo (29,945 ha, 3.3 %); Nyirol (14 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 40.3 °C, humidity dropped to 6 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 84, class Very extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.