Tancheng County fire, June 2026 郯城县 · Tancheng County, Pizhou City
The fire started on 9 June 2026 in Tancheng County, China, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,126 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
Number 809 in China in 2026, of 972.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Tancheng County · 2020
We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but not yet its hotspots: NASA publishes the yearly hotspot archive only once the year closes. The page picks them up automatically when they are available.
- Burnt area
- 1,126ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 2days
- 9 Jun 2026 – 10 Jun 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- counties
- Started on
- 9 Jun
- 2026
- Danger at start
- 13
- Moderate · FWI index
Where it burned
The weather it burned in
It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 19.1 mm on 19 Jun.
This area had burned before
2% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 7 ha in 2019, 22 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 23 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Beijing (Dongcheng and Xicheng) boundary: geoBoundaries · Lee Beryman, OpenStreetMap · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL 1.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
1,124 ha1.0 %
-
Pizhou City 邳州市1 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 24 hectares of built-up land and about 2,000 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun | 30.1 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 10 Jun | 30.1 °C | 31 % | 26 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 11 Jun after | 30.3 °C | 43 % | 32 km/h | 0.5 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 12 Jun after | 31.6 °C | 44 % | 22 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 13 Jun after | 31.8 °C | 41 % | 28 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 14 Jun after | 28.3 °C | 51 % | 38 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 15 Jun after | 27.0 °C | 53 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 16 Jun after | 28.1 °C | 57 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 17 Jun after | 29.7 °C | 55 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 18 Jun after | 27.3 °C | 70 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 10 |
| 19 Jun after | 24.7 °C | 79 % | 35 km/h | 19.1 mm | Very low 0 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 9 June 2026 the air beside the fire reached 74 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 40: 2.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Tancheng County fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 June 2026 and 10 June 2026: 2 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,126 hectares (11.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Tancheng County (1,124 ha, 1.0 %); Pizhou City (1 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 30.1 °C, humidity dropped to 30 % and gusts hit 28 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 16, class Moderate.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of China (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 119 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.