Skip to content
worldfires
AU · Australia · –

Tamworth fire, February 2019 Tamworth

Out · last detection 16 Feb 2019, 15:57 UTC

The fire started on 11 February 2019 in Tamworth, Australia, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,429 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 111th largest in New South Wales since 2016 (of 122 with a page). Number 275 in Australia in 2019, of 288.

Burnt area
5,429ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
11 Feb 2019 – 16 Feb 2019
Municipalities hit
1
local government areas
Started on
11 Feb
2019
Heat detections
392
in a single hotspot: 110 MW
Danger at start
32
High · FWI index
Average daily power
1.1GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 11 Feb16 Feb
16 Feb 2019

How it evolved, day by day

11 Feb 2019 · 105 MW · 41 12 Feb 2019 · 2,125 MW · 93 13 Feb 2019 · 3,710 MW · 197 14 Feb 2019 · 393 MW · 27 15 Feb 2019 · 138 MW · 17 16 Feb 2019 · 277 MW · 17
11 Feb 13 Feb 15 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

32°high
54km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

11% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 676 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 597 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.4% of the area of London (54 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Tamworth where it started
    5,421 ha reached on 11 Feb
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area1.8 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.8 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
11 Feb 29.4 °C 17 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
12 Feb 31.6 °C 14 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
13 Feb 31.4 °C 17 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
14 Feb 26.5 °C 27 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
15 Feb 28.3 °C 21 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
16 Feb 29.0 °C 22 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
17 Feb after 30.0 °C 19 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
18 Feb after 32.1 °C 18 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
19 Feb after 33.5 °C 21 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
20 Feb after 34.2 °C 20 % 44 km/h 0.2 mm High 37
21 Feb after 29.7 °C 35 % 47 km/h 0.9 mm High 26
22 Feb after 26.4 °C 32 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
23 Feb after 25.4 °C 30 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
24 Feb after 25.0 °C 31 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
25 Feb after 25.0 °C 36 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
26 Feb after 27.0 °C 20 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 32

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 31.7, a minimum humidity of 17% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 27.

FWI at the start 31.7
Minimum humidity 17 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Inverell fire, December 2023
15,928 ha 9 days FWI 29.8 Min. humidity 18 % 185 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 10.2 mm on 19 Dec.

What happened to them

16 days
median duration
17,487 ha
median area
63 %
went past 10,000 ha
3.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 24 of 27 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 5,429 ha against a median of 17,487 ha. It lasted 6 days, against 16 days.

In 3 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
54km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 16 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 24 of 27, with a median of 3.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 4 Feb 2019
After · 23 Feb 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 392Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Australia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Tamworth fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 11 February 2019 and 16 February 2019: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,429 hectares (54.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Tamworth (5,421 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 31.6 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 42, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Australia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 27. Their median duration was 16 days and their median area 17,487 ha; 63 % went past 10,000 ha. In 3 of 27, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 000 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 000.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 392 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.