Skip to content
worldfires
AZ · Azerbaijan · –

Shaki District fire, 3 August 2019 Shaki District, Qabala District

Out · last detection 5 Aug 2019, 10:18 UTC

The fire started on 3 August 2019 in Shaki District, Azerbaijan, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 870 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 122th largest in Contiguous Azerbaijan since 2016 (of 278 with a page). Number 36 in Azerbaijan in 2019, of 74.

The power measured by the satellite is low (11.8 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
870ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
3days
3 Aug 2019 – 5 Aug 2019
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
3 Aug
2019
Heat detections
22
in a single hotspot: 12 MW
Danger at start
11
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
37MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 3 Aug5 Aug
5 Aug 2019

How it evolved, day by day

3 Aug 2019 · 24 MW · 9 4 Aug 2019 · 8 MW · 2 5 Aug 2019 · 80 MW · 11
3 Aug 4 Aug 5 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
59km/h · peak gust
25%lowest humidity

It had gone 19 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

52% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 252 ha in 2017, 294 ha in 2018. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 456 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.5% of the area of London (8.7 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Shaki District where it started
    866 ha reached on 3 Aug
    0.4 %
  2. 0 ha
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area0.13 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.13 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
3 Aug 30.0 °C 46 % 26 km/h 1.9 mm Moderate 11
4 Aug 30.9 °C 38 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
5 Aug 34.8 °C 25 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
6 Aug after 25.0 °C 43 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
7 Aug after 26.6 °C 37 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
8 Aug after 25.4 °C 37 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
9 Aug after 26.0 °C 39 % 29 km/h 0.2 mm High 25
10 Aug after 30.5 °C 37 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
11 Aug after 30.2 °C 39 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
12 Aug after 27.6 °C 39 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
13 Aug after 28.0 °C 40 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
14 Aug after 29.7 °C 41 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
15 Aug after 30.4 °C 43 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 29

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 11.2, a minimum humidity of 46% and 19 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 56.

FWI at the start 11.2
Minimum humidity 46 %
Days without rain 19
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Agdam District fire, July 2016
651 ha 4 days FWI 16.3 Min. humidity 45 % 95 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 7.7 mm on 11 Jul.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
635 ha
median area
20 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 39 of 56 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (870 ha against a median of 635 ha) and lasted 3 days, against 4 days.

In 17 of 56, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
59km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 5 Aug, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 39 of 56, with a median of 2.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 27 Jul 2019
After · 12 Aug 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 22Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Azerbaijan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Shaki District fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 August 2019 and 5 August 2019: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 870 hectares (8.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Shaki District (866 ha, 0.4 %); Qabala District (0 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.8 °C, humidity dropped to 25 % and gusts hit 59 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 48, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Azerbaijan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 56. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 635 ha; 20 % went past 1,000 ha. In 17 of 56, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 22 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.