Skip to content
worldfires
ZM · Zambia · –

Sesheke fire, 24 July 2016 Sioma, Sesheke

Out · last detection 27 Jul 2016, 11:44 UTC

The fire started on 24 July 2016 in Sesheke, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,299 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 18th largest in Western since 2016 (of 98 with a page). Number 73 in Zambia in 2016, of 246.

Compare with…
Burnt area
6,299ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
4days
24 Jul 2016 – 27 Jul 2016
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
24 Jul
2016
Heat detections
151
in a single hotspot: 138 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
776MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 24 Jul27 Jul
27 Jul 2016

How it evolved, day by day

24 Jul 2016 · 649 MW · 32 25 Jul 2016 · 586 MW · 37 26 Jul 2016 · 1,850 MW · 78 27 Jul 2016 · 20 MW · 4
24 Jul 25 Jul 26 Jul 27 Jul

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

30°high
32km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4% of the area of London (63 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. 3,252 ha
    0.4 %
  2. Sesheke where it started
    3,085 ha
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 91 % of the area in Zambia

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
24 Jul 27.6 °C 16 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
25 Jul 28.6 °C 14 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
26 Jul 29.0 °C 17 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
27 Jul 29.6 °C 12 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
28 Jul after 30.1 °C 18 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
29 Jul after 30.6 °C 11 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
30 Jul after 30.9 °C 7 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
31 Jul after 31.0 °C 12 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
1 Aug after 30.7 °C 17 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
2 Aug after 29.8 °C 10 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 57
3 Aug after 30.3 °C 8 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
4 Aug after 26.9 °C 15 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
5 Aug after 28.0 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
6 Aug after 27.3 °C 22 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 46.0, a minimum humidity of 16% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 36.

FWI at the start 46.0
Minimum humidity 16 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Kongola fire, September 2022
3,232 ha 10 days FWI 44.6 Min. humidity 16 % 119 km away, in 2022

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

9 days
median duration
3,948 ha
median area
11 %
went past 10,000 ha
—
rain at the end (median; 0 of 36 had it)

It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 4 days, against 9 days.

Only 8 of its 36 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
32km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 27 Jul, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 36 twins had rain when they ended.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 17 Jul 2016
After · 3 Aug 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 151Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Zambia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Sesheke fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 July 2016 and 27 July 2016: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,299 hectares (63.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Sioma (3,252 ha, 0.4 %); Sesheke (3,085 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 29.6 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 32 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 51, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 36. Their median duration was 9 days and their median area 3,948 ha; 11 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 8 of its 36 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Name: Sioma → Sesheke.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 151 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.