Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Riacho Frio fire, 19 September 2018 Riacho Frio, Parnaguá

Out · last detection 14 Oct 2018, 15:41 UTC

The fire started on 19 September 2018 in Riacho Frio, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 24,602 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 16th largest in Piaui since 2016 (of 665 with a page). Number 4 in Brazil in 2018, of 291.

Burnt area
24,602ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
26days
19 Sept 2018 – 14 Oct 2018
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
19 Sept
2018
Heat detections
891
in a single hotspot: 554 MW
Danger at start
52
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
571MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 19 Sept14 Oct
14 Oct 2018

How it evolved, day by day

19 Sept 2018 · 463 MW · 9 20 Sept 2018 · 217 MW · 34 21 Sept 2018 · 94 MW · 20 22 Sept 2018 · 643 MW · 9 23 Sept 2018 · 1,403 MW · 37 24 Sept 2018 · 84 MW · 47 25 Sept 2018 · 7 MW · 4 26 Sept 2018 · 129 MW · 14 27 Sept 2018 · 1,165 MW · 34 28 Sept 2018 · 4,064 MW · 94 29 Sept 2018 · 2,032 MW · 147 30 Sept 2018 · 954 MW · 92 1 Oct 2018 · 910 MW · 82 2 Oct 2018 · 635 MW · 46 3 Oct 2018 · 128 MW · 52 4 Oct 2018 · 153 MW · 40 5 Oct 2018 · 423 MW · 35 6 Oct 2018 · 28 MW · 3 7 Oct 2018 · 42 MW · 4 8 Oct 2018 · 6 MW · 1 9 Oct 2018 · 106 MW · 9 10 Oct 2018 · 878 MW · 32 11 Oct 2018 · 186 MW · 29 12 Oct 2018 · 17 MW · 6 13 Oct 2018 · 71 MW · 9 14 Oct 2018 · 15 MW · 2
19 Sept 28 Sept 7 Oct 13 Oct

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
42km/h · peak gust
18%lowest humidity

It had gone 12 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 23.6 mm on 16 Oct.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 16% of the area of London (246 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Riacho Frio 4,165 inhabitants where it started
    23,672 ha reached on 19 Sept
    11 %
  2. Parnaguá 10,103 inhabitants
    1,131 ha reached on 23 Sept
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area6.6 ha
Residents≈ 200

Inside the perimeter there were about 6.6 hectares of built-up land and about 200 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
19 Sept 38.5 °C 21 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
20 Sept 37.3 °C 18 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
21 Sept 37.1 °C 23 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
22 Sept 38.4 °C 21 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
23 Sept 37.6 °C 27 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
24 Sept 35.7 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
25 Sept 36.3 °C 30 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
26 Sept 37.0 °C 26 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
27 Sept 37.6 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
28 Sept 38.5 °C 24 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
29 Sept 38.2 °C 24 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
30 Sept 37.3 °C 29 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
1 Oct 36.5 °C 30 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
2 Oct 37.2 °C 25 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
3 Oct 37.0 °C 28 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
4 Oct 39.0 °C 25 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
5 Oct 36.6 °C 32 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
6 Oct 35.8 °C 33 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
7 Oct 35.9 °C 32 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
8 Oct 37.1 °C 26 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
9 Oct 37.2 °C 24 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
10 Oct 38.3 °C 23 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
11 Oct 38.6 °C 22 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
12 Oct 37.2 °C 25 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
13 Oct 37.5 °C 25 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
14 Oct 36.2 °C 37 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
15 Oct after 36.8 °C 35 % 27 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 39
16 Oct after 29.1 °C 66 % 33 km/h 23.6 mm Very low 4

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 52.2, a minimum humidity of 21% and 12 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 21.

FWI at the start 52.2
Minimum humidity 21 %
Days without rain 12
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Santa Filomena fire, September 2023
7,439 ha 9 days FWI 52.0 Min. humidity 21 % 129 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 26 Sept.

What happened to them

13 days
median duration
7,784 ha
median area
43 %
went past 10,000 ha
2.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 11 of 21 had it)

It was 3.2 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 26 days, against 13 days.

Only 2 of its 21 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 10 of 21, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

23.6 mmfirst rain
16 Oct2 days after it ended
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 14 Oct, and on 16 Oct 23.6 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 11 of 21, with a median of 2.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 12 Sept 2018
After · 21 Oct 2018

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 891Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Riacho Frio fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 19 September 2018 and 14 October 2018: 26 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 24,602 hectares (246.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Riacho Frio (23,672 ha, 11 %); Parnaguá (1,131 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.0 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 58, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 21. Their median duration was 13 days and their median area 7,784 ha; 43 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 2 of its 21 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 10 of 21, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 891 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.