Pium fire, 4 September 2024 Pium, Lagoa da Confusão
The fire started on 4 September 2024 in Pium, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,857 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 479th largest in Tocantins since 2016 (of 1242 with a page). Number 574 in Brazil in 2024, of 1301.
- Burnt area
- 5,857ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 9days
- 4 Sept 2024 – 12 Sept 2024
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 4 Sept
- 2024
- Heat detections
- 172
- in a single hotspot: 62 MW
- Danger at start
- 49
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 1.5GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
67% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 436 ha in 2016, 1,569 ha in 2017, 1,808 ha in 2019, 925 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,946 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
4,903 ha reached on 4 Sept0.5 %
-
Lagoa da Confusão 15,288 inhabitants1,000 ha reached on 8 Sept0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug | 35.9 °C | 29 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 31 Aug | 36.5 °C | 23 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 1 Sept | 37.4 °C | 22 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 2 Sept | 37.5 °C | 20 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 3 Sept | 37.6 °C | 17 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 4 Sept | 39.2 °C | 15 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 5 Sept | 39.1 °C | 14 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 6 Sept | 38.6 °C | 13 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 7 Sept | 38.4 °C | 16 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 8 Sept | 38.4 °C | 19 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 9 Sept | 37.7 °C | 21 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 10 Sept | 38.0 °C | 18 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 11 Sept | 38.2 °C | 19 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 12 Sept | 38.4 °C | 20 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 13 Sept after | 38.8 °C | 18 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 14 Sept after | 38.2 °C | 18 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 15 Sept after | 39.0 °C | 16 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 16 Sept after | 39.2 °C | 17 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 17 Sept after | 40.5 °C | 15 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 18 Sept after | 38.4 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.1 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 19 Sept after | 38.6 °C | 19 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 20 Sept after | 39.4 °C | 16 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 21 Sept after | 39.6 °C | 16 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 22 Sept after | 38.8 °C | 24 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 23 Sept after | 39.8 °C | 20 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 24 Sept after | 37.2 °C | 31 % | 18 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 42 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 7 September 2024 the air beside the fire reached 123 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 51: 3.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 172Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 96,370 haLagoa da Confusão24 August 2019 · 36 days · 29 km away
- 74,474 haPium31 August 2017 · 25 days · 35 km away
- 68,512 haLagoa da Confusão16 August 2024 · 33 days · 35 km away
- 54,674 haLagoa da Confusão1 September 2023 · 26 days · 37 km away
- 37,878 haLagoa da Confusão27 August 2016 · 21 days · 37 km away
- 41,580 haPium6 August 2019 · 42 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Pium fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 4 September 2024 and 12 September 2024: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,857 hectares (58.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Pium (4,903 ha, 0.5 %); Lagoa da Confusão (1,000 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 39.2 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 58, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.