Skip to content
worldfires
SS · South Sudan · →

Pibor fire, 28 January 2021 Pibor

Out · last detection 5 Feb 2021, 22:33 UTC

The fire started on 28 January 2021 in Pibor, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 17,717 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 34th largest in Jonglei since 2016 (of 427 with a page). Number 22 in South Sudan in 2021, of 212.

Compare with…
Burnt area
17,717ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
9days
28 Jan 2021 – 5 Feb 2021
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
28 Jan
2021
Heat detections
667
in a single hotspot: 227 MW
Danger at start
50
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
942MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 28 Jan5 Feb
5 Feb 2021

How it evolved, day by day

28 Jan 2021 · 93 MW · 16 29 Jan 2021 · 2,960 MW · 397 30 Jan 2021 · 181 MW · 38 31 Jan 2021 · 49 MW · 8 2 Feb 2021 · 63 MW · 7 3 Feb 2021 · 2,194 MW · 120 4 Feb 2021 · 688 MW · 38 5 Feb 2021 · 1,311 MW · 43
28 Jan 29 Jan 30 Jan 2 Feb 4 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

40°high
54km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity

It had gone 26 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

48% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,426 ha in 2016, 202 ha in 2017, 3,357 ha in 2018, 902 ha in 2019, 561 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 8,580 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 11% of the area of London (177 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Pibor where it started
    17,826 ha reached on 28 Jan
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
28 Jan 38.2 °C 19 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
29 Jan 37.2 °C 22 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
30 Jan 37.6 °C 12 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
31 Jan 39.1 °C 15 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
1 Feb 38.9 °C 16 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
2 Feb 39.2 °C 16 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
3 Feb 38.7 °C 18 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
4 Feb 39.5 °C 16 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
5 Feb 38.8 °C 13 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
6 Feb after 37.7 °C 9 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
7 Feb after 36.7 °C 9 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
8 Feb after 37.4 °C 8 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
9 Feb after 37.9 °C 15 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
10 Feb after 39.1 °C 19 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
11 Feb after 39.6 °C 15 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
12 Feb after 40.7 °C 12 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
13 Feb after 40.3 °C 11 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
14 Feb after 39.7 °C 19 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
15 Feb after 39.6 °C 19 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 21 Jan 2021
After · 12 Feb 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 667Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in South Sudan ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Pibor fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 28 January 2021 and 5 February 2021: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 17,717 hectares (177.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Pibor (17,826 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.5 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 66, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 667 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.