Skip to content
worldfires
LA · Laos · –

Paksxong fire, February 2026 Paksxong, Sanamxay

Out · last detection 24 Feb 2026, 06:48 UTC

The fire started on 1 February 2026 in Paksxong, Laos, and satellites saw it burning for 24 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,775 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

Number 124 in Laos in 2026, of 308.

GWIS near-real-time perimeter, from the layer that changed in October 2025: this fire is not compared with fires from earlier years, because since then the GWIS layer gives more and larger perimeters.

Burnt area
3,775ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
24days
1 Feb 2026 – 24 Feb 2026
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
1 Feb
2026
Heat detections
230
in a single hotspot: 44 MW
Danger at start
24
High · FWI index
Average daily power
80MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Feb24 Feb
24 Feb 2026

How it evolved, day by day

1 Feb 2026 · 43 MW · 21 2 Feb 2026 · 3 MW · 3 4 Feb 2026 · 1 MW · 1 5 Feb 2026 · 65 MW · 12 6 Feb 2026 · 28 MW · 3 8 Feb 2026 · 11 MW · 2 9 Feb 2026 · 94 MW · 8 10 Feb 2026 · 211 MW · 18 11 Feb 2026 · 255 MW · 24 12 Feb 2026 · 89 MW · 11 13 Feb 2026 · 62 MW · 12 14 Feb 2026 · 107 MW · 12 15 Feb 2026 · 35 MW · 12 16 Feb 2026 · 228 MW · 27 17 Feb 2026 · 21 MW · 9 18 Feb 2026 · 18 MW · 8 19 Feb 2026 · 242 MW · 26 20 Feb 2026 · 49 MW · 8 21 Feb 2026 · 34 MW · 12 24 Feb 2026 · 6 MW · 1
1 Feb 6 Feb 11 Feb 15 Feb 19 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

32°high
38km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 41 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 10.2 mm on 27 Feb.

This area had burned before

87% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 470 ha in 2016, 214 ha in 2017, 318 ha in 2019, 2,362 ha in 2020, 3,126 ha in 2021, 2,749 ha in 2022, 2,757 ha in 2023, 2,413 ha in 2024, 1,194 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,298 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.4% of the area of London (38 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Paksxong where it started
    3,156 ha reached on 1 Feb
    0.9 %
  2. 640 ha reached on 9 Feb
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.11 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.11 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Feb 27.1 °C 39 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
2 Feb 26.1 °C 47 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
3 Feb 28.3 °C 41 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
4 Feb 29.4 °C 37 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
5 Feb 30.3 °C 37 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
6 Feb 31.2 °C 33 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
7 Feb 27.1 °C 58 % 26 km/h 2.2 mm Very low 5
8 Feb 29.8 °C 35 % 34 km/h 0.8 mm Moderate 17
9 Feb 29.9 °C 33 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
10 Feb 30.7 °C 27 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
11 Feb 31.0 °C 33 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
12 Feb 30.6 °C 33 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
13 Feb 31.1 °C 36 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
14 Feb 31.1 °C 35 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
15 Feb 31.3 °C 30 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
16 Feb 31.6 °C 34 % 25 km/h 0.7 mm Moderate 21
17 Feb 31.7 °C 29 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
18 Feb 31.5 °C 33 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
19 Feb 30.7 °C 33 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
20 Feb 30.7 °C 34 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
21 Feb 31.4 °C 33 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
22 Feb 30.9 °C 37 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
23 Feb 30.0 °C 47 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
24 Feb 31.5 °C 39 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
25 Feb after 30.6 °C 40 % 28 km/h 0.1 mm High 24
26 Feb after 29.6 °C 44 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
27 Feb after 22.8 °C 69 % 17 km/h 10.2 mm Very low 0

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Jan 2026
After · 3 Mar 2026

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 26 February 2026 the air beside the fire reached 84 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 52: 3.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak84 µg/m³
Days over the guideline18 days
PM1085 µg/m³
Optical depth1.12
30 Jan5 Feb11 Feb17 Feb23 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 230Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Laos

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Paksxong fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 1 February 2026 to 24 February 2026 (24 days). The perimeter dates it from 8 February 2026 to 23 February 2026.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,775 hectares (37.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Paksxong (3,156 ha, 0.9 %); Sanamxay (640 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 31.7 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 27, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Laos (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 23 February 2026 → 24 February 2026.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 8 February 2026 to 23 February 2026. 230 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.