Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · –

Non Sang fire, January 2025 โนนสัง · Non Sang, Ubolratana, Khao Suan Kwang

Out · last detection 10 Feb 2025, 19:20 UTC

The fire started on 30 January 2025 in Non Sang, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 12 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,143 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

Number 137 in Thailand in 2025, of 173.

The power measured by the satellite is low (10.6 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
1,143ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
12days
30 Jan 2025 – 10 Feb 2025
Municipalities hit
3
districts
Started on
30 Jan
2025
Heat detections
27
in a single hotspot: 11 MW
Danger at start
24
High · FWI index
Average daily power
18MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 30 Jan10 Feb
10 Feb 2025

How it evolved, day by day

30 Jan 2025 · 1 MW · 1 1 Feb 2025 · 10 MW · 7 2 Feb 2025 · 75 MW · 16 3 Feb 2025 · 4 MW · 1 10 Feb 2025 · 2 MW · 2
30 Jan 1 Feb 2 Feb 3 Feb 10 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
43km/h · peak gust
29%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

86% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 383 ha in 2017, 799 ha in 2019, 137 ha in 2020, 694 ha in 2021, 561 ha in 2023, 101 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 978 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.7% of the area of London (11 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Non Sang โนนสัง where it started
    907 ha reached on 30 Jan
    1.4 %
  2. Ubolratana อุบลรัตน์
    218 ha reached on 2 Feb
    0.5 %
  3. Khao Suan Kwang เขาสวนกวาง
    26 ha
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.12 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.12 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 14 % of the area in Thailand

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
30 Jan 28.5 °C 42 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
31 Jan 31.5 °C 35 % 16 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
1 Feb 33.4 °C 31 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
2 Feb 34.7 °C 29 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
3 Feb 33.7 °C 37 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
4 Feb 28.1 °C 40 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
5 Feb 28.8 °C 46 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
6 Feb 32.1 °C 43 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
7 Feb 32.0 °C 43 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
8 Feb 28.9 °C 40 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
9 Feb 27.2 °C 40 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
10 Feb 28.7 °C 39 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
11 Feb after 31.2 °C 38 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
12 Feb after 33.5 °C 33 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
13 Feb after 33.8 °C 33 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
14 Feb after 33.2 °C 39 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
15 Feb after 35.3 °C 32 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
16 Feb after 34.7 °C 36 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
17 Feb after 32.8 °C 46 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
18 Feb after 31.8 °C 44 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
19 Feb after 31.4 °C 47 % 24 km/h 0.1 mm High 27
20 Feb after 32.4 °C 45 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 26

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 23.7, a minimum humidity of 42% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 29.

FWI at the start 23.7
Minimum humidity 42 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Phu Kradueng fire, February 2020
3,122 ha 18 days FWI 22.5 Min. humidity 41 % 96 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 13.2 mm on 3 Mar.

What happened to them

7 days
median duration
1,470 ha
median area
97 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 14 of 29 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,143 ha against a median of 1,470 ha) and lasted 12 days, against 7 days.

In 15 of 29, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
43km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 10 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 14 of 29, with a median of 5.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 23 Jan 2025
After · 17 Feb 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 2 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 49 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 26: 1.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak49 µg/m³
Days over the guideline8 days
PM1049 µg/m³
Optical depth0.59
28 Jan30 Jan1 Feb3 Feb5 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 27Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Non Sang fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 30 January 2025 to 10 February 2025 (12 days). The perimeter dates it from 30 January 2025 to 3 February 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,143 hectares (11.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Non Sang (907 ha, 1.4 %); Ubolratana (218 ha, 0.5 %); Khao Suan Kwang (26 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.7 °C, humidity dropped to 29 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 38, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 29. Their median duration was 7 days and their median area 1,470 ha; 97 % went past 1,000 ha. In 15 of 29, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 3 February 2025 → 10 February 2025.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 30 January 2025 to 3 February 2025. 27 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.