Mulchén fire, 3 February 2023 Mulchén, Collipulli, Renaico
The fire started on 3 February 2023 in Mulchén, Chile, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 19,213 hectares from heat detections, spread across 4 municipalities.
It is the 5th largest in Región del Bío-Bío since 2016 (of 74 with a page). Number 4 in Chile in 2023, of 70.
- Burnt area
- 19,213ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 11days
- 3 Feb 2023 – 13 Feb 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 4
- communes
- Started on
- 3 Feb
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 1,361
- in a single hotspot: 603 MW
- Danger at start
- 53
- Extreme · FWI index
- Energy released
- 31.5GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
26% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,527 ha in 2017, 883 ha in 2018, 914 ha in 2019, 901 ha in 2021, 789 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,923 ha that had burned before.
- 2,527 ha Mulchén fire, January 2017 4,094 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 518 ha Collipulli fire, February 2022 3,151 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 84 ha Mulchén fire, February 2022 1,742 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Mulchén where it started18,505 ha reached on 3 Feb9.6 %
-
672 ha reached on 4 Feb0.5 %
-
24 ha0.1 %
-
5 ha reached on 8 Feb0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Feb | 40.0 °C | 15 % | 59 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 4 Feb | 34.3 °C | 28 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 5 Feb | 29.7 °C | 37 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 6 Feb | 30.3 °C | 30 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 7 Feb | 30.3 °C | 24 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 8 Feb | 30.3 °C | 34 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 9 Feb | 31.0 °C | 28 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 10 Feb | 29.1 °C | 36 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 11 Feb | 28.9 °C | 30 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 12 Feb | 25.5 °C | 46 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 13 Feb | 25.1 °C | 34 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 14 Feb after | 23.4 °C | 45 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 15 Feb after | 24.9 °C | 43 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 16 Feb after | 22.5 °C | 30 % | 62 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 17 Feb after | 27.5 °C | 14 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 18 Feb after | 29.3 °C | 17 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 19 Feb after | 27.5 °C | 38 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 20 Feb after | 27.6 °C | 26 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 21 Feb after | 28.7 °C | 27 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 22 Feb after | 28.9 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 23 Feb after | 29.6 °C | 31 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 24 Feb after | 27.5 °C | 32 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 25 Feb after | 22.5 °C | 34 % | 40 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 32 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 5 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 771 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 495: 33 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1,361Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,094 haMulchén22 January 2017 · 4 days · 6 km away
- 5,902 haMulchén12 February 2022 · 4 days · 19 km away
- 8,462 haMulchén3 February 2023 · 10 days · 23 km away
- 11,526 haMulchén3 February 2023 · 10 days · 36 km away
- 13,252 haLos SaucesDecember 2021 · 7 days · 37 km away
- 10,542 haCollipulli1 February 2023 · 10 days · 37 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mulchén fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 February 2023 and 13 February 2023: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 19,213 hectares (192.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 4 municipalities: Mulchén (18,505 ha, 9.6 %); Collipulli (672 ha, 0.5 %); Renaico (24 ha, 0.1 %); Los Ángeles (5 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 40.0 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 59 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 53, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Chile (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 130 (CONAF) · 132
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.