Skip to content
worldfires
ZM · Zambia · →

Mpika fire, 20 September 2018 Mpika

Out · last detection 27 Sept 2018, 10:55 UTC

The fire started on 20 September 2018 in Mpika, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,972 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 236th largest in Muchinga since 2016 (of 516 with a page). Number 78 in Zambia in 2018, of 204.

Compare with…
Burnt area
4,972ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
8days
20 Sept 2018 – 27 Sept 2018
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
20 Sept
2018
Heat detections
182
in a single hotspot: 88 MW
Danger at start
50
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
149MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 20 Sept27 Sept
27 Sept 2018

How it evolved, day by day

20 Sept 2018 · 13 MW · 12 21 Sept 2018 · 79 MW · 9 22 Sept 2018 · 113 MW · 27 23 Sept 2018 · 151 MW · 34 24 Sept 2018 · 424 MW · 43 25 Sept 2018 · 101 MW · 22 26 Sept 2018 · 152 MW · 13 27 Sept 2018 · 157 MW · 22
20 Sept 22 Sept 24 Sept 26 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
42km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

80% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,137 ha in 2016, 2,815 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,998 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.1% of the area of London (50 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Mpika where it started
    4,996 ha reached on 20 Sept
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
20 Sept 33.8 °C 25 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
21 Sept 33.8 °C 25 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
22 Sept 35.3 °C 17 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
23 Sept 34.0 °C 20 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
24 Sept 33.6 °C 20 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
25 Sept 34.2 °C 17 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
26 Sept 36.7 °C 14 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
27 Sept 36.2 °C 17 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 59
28 Sept after 36.0 °C 16 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
29 Sept after 35.7 °C 17 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
30 Sept after 31.5 °C 24 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
1 Oct after 29.0 °C 34 % 37 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 38
2 Oct after 31.8 °C 27 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
3 Oct after 34.3 °C 24 % 28 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 38
4 Oct after 36.1 °C 21 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
5 Oct after 33.7 °C 27 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
6 Oct after 34.5 °C 21 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
7 Oct after 34.3 °C 17 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 13 Sept 2018
After · 4 Oct 2018

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 182Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Zambia ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mpika fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 20 September 2018 and 27 September 2018: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,972 hectares (49.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Mpika (4,996 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 36.7 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 59, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 182 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.