Mbarali fire, August 2025 Mbarali
The fire started on 29 August 2025 in Mbarali, Tanzania, and satellites saw it burning for 16 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 9,766 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 14th largest in Mbeya since 2016 (of 147 with a page). Number 18 in Tanzania in 2025, of 161.
- Burnt area
- 9,766ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 16days
- 29 Aug 2025 – 13 Sept 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 29 Aug
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 268
- in a single hotspot: 87 MW
- Danger at start
- 49
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 3.0GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
92% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,200 ha in 2016, 4,292 ha in 2017, 2,865 ha in 2018, 2,130 ha in 2019, 1,539 ha in 2020, 2,101 ha in 2021, 909 ha in 2022, 2,610 ha in 2023, 2,533 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 8,967 ha that had burned before.
- 2,818 ha Mbarali fire, August 2017 4,038 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,791 ha Mbarali fire, September 2016 3,705 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,075 ha Mbarali fire, September 2021 4,467 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 628 ha Mbarali fire, September 2024 3,123 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Mbarali where it started9,823 ha reached on 29 Aug0.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug | 29.2 °C | 14 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 30 Aug | 28.4 °C | 22 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 31 Aug | 29.0 °C | 14 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 1 Sept | 29.9 °C | 14 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 2 Sept | 29.3 °C | 21 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 3 Sept | 29.8 °C | 19 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 4 Sept | 30.0 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 5 Sept | 30.4 °C | 12 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 6 Sept | 30.9 °C | 13 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 7 Sept | 30.4 °C | 16 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 8 Sept | 30.1 °C | 21 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 9 Sept | 30.7 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 10 Sept | 31.7 °C | 22 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 11 Sept | 31.1 °C | 16 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 12 Sept | 29.6 °C | 18 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 13 Sept | 30.0 °C | 16 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 14 Sept after | 32.1 °C | 18 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 15 Sept after | 31.4 °C | 27 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Sept after | 30.1 °C | 27 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 17 Sept after | 30.4 °C | 25 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 18 Sept after | 31.7 °C | 24 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 19 Sept after | 31.5 °C | 23 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 20 Sept after | 29.6 °C | 24 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 21 Sept after | 30.6 °C | 23 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 22 Sept after | 30.1 °C | 27 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 23 Sept after | 30.7 °C | 23 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 8 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 46 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 25: 1.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 268Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 11,028 haMbarali16 September 2026 · 23 days · 12 km away
- 18,660 haMbarali6 July 2016 · 15 days · 25 km away
- 9,218 haMbarali1 September 2021 · 9 days · 34 km away
- 16,427 haMbarali6 October 2020 · 7 days · 35 km away
- 17,501 haIringa6 September 2025 · 17 days · 38 km away
- 140,758 haMbarali4 September 2021 · 45 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mbarali fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 29 August 2025 and 13 September 2025: 16 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 9,766 hectares (97.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Mbarali (9,823 ha, 0.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 31.7 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Tanzania (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.