Mbarali fire, 4 September 2021 Iringa, Mbarali
The fire started on 4 September 2021 in Mbarali, Tanzania, and satellites saw it burning for 45 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 140,758 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
This page is probably a fire complex, not a single fire. GWIS merges into one perimeter the fires that touch over weeks, which in large burning seasons can join dozens of separate fires. The total area is reliable; the origin and dates refer to the whole complex.
Other fire pages in the same area and on the same dates:
It is the largest fire in Mbeya since 2016 (of 148 with a page). The largest in Tanzania in 2021, of 135.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Iringa · 2016Iringa · 2018Iringa · 2019Iringa · 2019
- Burnt area
- 140,758ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 45days
- 4 Sept 2021 – 18 Oct 2021
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 4 Sept
- 2021
- Heat detections
- 4,562
- in a single hotspot: 188 MW
- Danger at start
- 33
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 697MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
93% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 91,590 ha in 2016, 22,204 ha in 2017, 68,211 ha in 2018, 77,770 ha in 2019, 42,969 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 131,051 ha that had burned before.
- 75,432 ha Iringa fire, August 2016 138,240 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 60,660 ha Iringa fire, September 2018 113,445 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 44,632 ha Iringa fire, July 2019 97,386 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 18,629 ha Iringa fire, July 2019 26,840 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 17,610 ha Iringa fire, August 2020 27,011 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 12,369 ha Iringa fire, August 2020 16,104 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 8,142 ha Iringa fire, August 2017 39,206 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 8,123 ha Chunya fire, July 2016 32,137 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
133,512 ha reached on 5 Sept7.1 %
-
Mbarali where it started8,138 ha reached on 4 Sept0.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there were about 2.4 hectares of built-up land and about 200 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept | 30.0 °C | 25 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 5 Sept | 29.5 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 6 Sept | 30.0 °C | 31 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 7 Sept | 29.6 °C | 33 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 8 Sept | 31.2 °C | 32 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 9 Sept | 30.0 °C | 29 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 10 Sept | 27.9 °C | 34 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 11 Sept | 28.7 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 12 Sept | 31.2 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 13 Sept | 29.3 °C | 31 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 14 Sept | 31.2 °C | 30 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 15 Sept | 30.7 °C | 34 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 16 Sept | 31.0 °C | 37 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 17 Sept | 33.1 °C | 33 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 18 Sept | 32.3 °C | 24 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 19 Sept | 31.7 °C | 26 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 20 Sept | 31.1 °C | 26 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 21 Sept | 30.8 °C | 31 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 22 Sept | 31.3 °C | 28 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 23 Sept | 31.2 °C | 23 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 24 Sept | 30.5 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 25 Sept | 31.7 °C | 25 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 26 Sept | 30.8 °C | 27 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 27 Sept | 32.0 °C | 26 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 28 Sept | 32.5 °C | 28 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 29 Sept | 32.1 °C | 33 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 30 Sept | 33.3 °C | 26 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 1 Oct | 31.4 °C | 27 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 2 Oct | 32.0 °C | 28 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 3 Oct | 32.7 °C | 30 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 4 Oct | 31.2 °C | 31 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 5 Oct | 33.3 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 6 Oct | 31.2 °C | 29 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 7 Oct | 33.8 °C | 19 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 8 Oct | 32.8 °C | 27 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 9 Oct | 33.2 °C | 27 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 10 Oct | 32.4 °C | 30 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 11 Oct | 32.6 °C | 23 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 12 Oct | 30.5 °C | 26 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 13 Oct | 30.4 °C | 30 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 14 Oct | 31.7 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 15 Oct | 30.9 °C | 34 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 16 Oct | 31.4 °C | 36 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 17 Oct | 32.1 °C | 33 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 18 Oct | 30.9 °C | 34 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 19 Oct after | 30.7 °C | 34 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 20 Oct after | 30.7 °C | 31 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 21 Oct after | 32.1 °C | 25 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 22 Oct after | 31.6 °C | 31 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 23 Oct after | 34.3 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 24 Oct after | 35.3 °C | 24 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 25 Oct after | 33.8 °C | 26 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 26 Oct after | 33.1 °C | 27 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 27 Oct after | 32.7 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 28 Oct after | 32.9 °C | 24 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 4,562Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 26,840 haIringa29 July 2019 · 17 days · 23 km away
- 138,240 haIringaAugust 2016 · 46 days · 24 km away
- 113,445 haIringaSeptember 2018 · 42 days · 33 km away
- 27,011 haIringa25 August 2020 · 13 days · 37 km away
- 42,802 haIringa27 July 2023 · 44 days · 38 km away
- 54,511 haIringa28 July 2024 · 25 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mbarali fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 4 September 2021 and 18 October 2021: 45 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 140,758 hectares (1,407.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Iringa (133,512 ha, 7.1 %); Mbarali (8,138 ha, 0.6 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.8 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Tanzania (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 7 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 4,562 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.