Mazatlán fire, February 2025 Mazatlán, Concordia
The fire started on 13 February 2025 in Mazatlán, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 37 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,518 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 30th largest in Sinaloa since 2016 (of 82 with a page). Number 52 in Mexico in 2025, of 166.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 3,518ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 37days
- 13 Feb 2025 – 21 Mar 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 13 Feb
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 543
- in a single hotspot: 47 MW
- Danger at start
- 25
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 80MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 32 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
5% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 160 ha in 2018.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
3,500 ha reached on 16 Feb1.4 %
-
38 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 0.11 hectares of built-up land and about 30 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb | 30.8 °C | 27 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 14 Feb | 31.5 °C | 28 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 15 Feb | 30.3 °C | 29 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 16 Feb | 32.1 °C | 27 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 17 Feb | 30.7 °C | 34 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 18 Feb | 29.6 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 19 Feb | 32.3 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 20 Feb | 32.8 °C | 22 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 21 Feb | 32.7 °C | 22 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 22 Feb | 33.8 °C | 18 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 23 Feb | 33.4 °C | 18 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 24 Feb | 33.1 °C | 22 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 25 Feb | 32.0 °C | 34 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 26 Feb | 31.3 °C | 37 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 27 Feb | 30.9 °C | 39 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 28 Feb | 31.9 °C | 37 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 1 Mar | 30.4 °C | 38 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 2 Mar | 33.0 °C | 28 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 3 Mar | 32.7 °C | 29 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 4 Mar | 32.0 °C | 18 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 5 Mar | 32.9 °C | 23 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 6 Mar | 31.7 °C | 24 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 7 Mar | 31.4 °C | 22 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 8 Mar | 30.6 °C | 22 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 9 Mar | 30.1 °C | 22 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 10 Mar | 30.5 °C | 20 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 11 Mar | 32.5 °C | 19 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 12 Mar | 33.9 °C | 14 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 13 Mar | 34.2 °C | 17 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 14 Mar | 30.7 °C | 21 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 15 Mar | 29.0 °C | 27 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 16 Mar | 32.1 °C | 24 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 17 Mar | 32.8 °C | 27 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 18 Mar | 32.6 °C | 27 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 19 Mar | 33.3 °C | 22 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 20 Mar | 33.2 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 21 Mar | 31.4 °C | 31 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 22 Mar after | 32.5 °C | 24 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 23 Mar after | 32.4 °C | 21 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Mar after | 33.6 °C | 22 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Mar after | 33.4 °C | 29 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 26 Mar after | 33.6 °C | 23 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 27 Mar after | 32.6 °C | 22 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 28 Mar after | 32.4 °C | 25 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 29 Mar after | 33.0 °C | 22 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 30 Mar after | 32.9 °C | 21 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 31 Mar after | 34.7 °C | 25 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 14 March 2025 the air beside the fire reached 34 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 20: 1.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 543Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 6,210 haConcordiaApril 2024 · 21 days · 14 km away
- 5,866 haSan IgnacioApril 2021 · 13 days · 15 km away
- 22,280 haSan Ignacio20 April 2019 · 41 days · 30 km away
- 14,538 haConcordiaMay 2025 · 29 days · 30 km away
- 10,267 haSan Ignacio10 May 2018 · 29 days · 31 km away
- 3,786 haSan Ignacio9 May 2018 · 18 days · 35 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mazatlán fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 13 February 2025 to 21 March 2025 (37 days). The perimeter dates it from 16 February 2025 to 21 March 2025.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,518 hectares (35.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Mazatlán (3,500 ha, 1.4 %); Concordia (38 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.2 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 40 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 43, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 16 February 2025 to 21 March 2025. 543 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.