Skip to content
worldfires
IT · Italy · –

Mazara del Vallo fire, July 2017 Mazara del Vallo, Petrosino

Out · last detection 11 Jul 2017, 12:55 UTC

The fire started on 11 July 2017 in Mazara del Vallo, Italy, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 309 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 23th largest in Trapani since 2016 (of 68 with a page). Number 91 in Italy in 2017, of 361.

The power measured by the satellite is low (7.9 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
309ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
3days
11 Jul 2017 – 13 Jul 2017
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
11 Jul
2017
Heat detections
3
in a single hotspot: 8 MW
Danger at start
50
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
20MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 11 Jul13 Jul

How it evolved, day by day

11 Jul 2017 · 20 MW · 3

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
39km/h · peak gust
37%lowest humidity

It had gone 22 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Mazara del Vallo 50,039 inhabitants · 4.3 km from the centre where it started
    281 ha reached on 11 Jul
    1.0 %
  2. Petrosino 7,903 inhabitants · 9.0 km from the centre
    28 ha
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Agricultural areas100 %

Natura 2000 protected area affected: 99 %

Natura 2000 sites (European Environment Agency, 2024 release) crossed by the perimeter.

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
11 Jul 29.9 °C 37 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
12 Jul 29.9 °C 52 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
13 Jul 30.6 °C 50 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
14 Jul after 28.1 °C 58 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
15 Jul after 28.2 °C 60 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
16 Jul after 28.8 °C 52 % 47 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 38
17 Jul after 28.6 °C 35 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
18 Jul after 28.9 °C 45 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
19 Jul after 27.3 °C 58 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
20 Jul after 28.0 °C 51 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
21 Jul after 28.5 °C 53 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
22 Jul after 28.9 °C 52 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
23 Jul after 30.7 °C 51 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 28

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 50.0, a minimum humidity of 37% and 22 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 24.

FWI at the start 50.0
Minimum humidity 37 %
Days without rain 22
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Sambuca di Sicilia fire, September 2023
119 ha 3 days FWI 49.6 Min. humidity 37 % 39 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.9 mm on 25 Sept.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
198 ha
median area
4 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.0 mm
rain at the end (median; 10 of 24 had it)

It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 3 days, against 2 days.

Only 7 of its 24 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 14 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.0 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
39km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 13 Jul, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 10 of 24, with a median of 2.0 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 4 Jul 2017
After · 20 Jul 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 12 July 2017 the air beside the fire reached 16 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak16 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1026 µg/m³
9 Jul11 Jul13 Jul
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 3Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Italy

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mazara del Vallo fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 11 July 2017 to 13 July 2017 (3 days). The perimeter dates it from 11 July 2017 to 11 July 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 309 hectares (3.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Mazara del Vallo (281 ha, 1.0 %); Petrosino (28 ha, 0.6 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Mazara del Vallo and came within 4.3 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.6 °C, humidity dropped to 37 % and gusts hit 39 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Italy (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 24. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 198 ha; 4 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 7 of its 24 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 14 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.0 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · 1515 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112 · 1515.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 11 July 2017 to 11 July 2017. 3 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM4 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.