Magdalena fire, 15 September 2022 Baures, Magdalena
The fire started on 15 September 2022 in Magdalena, Bolivia, and satellites saw it burning for 23 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 35,295 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 18th largest in Beni since 2016 (of 904 with a page). Number 12 in Bolivia in 2022, of 222.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 35,295ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 23days
- 15 Sept 2022 – 7 Oct 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 15 Sept
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 1,964
- in a single hotspot: 515 MW
- Danger at start
- 20
- Moderate · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 1.7GW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 4.8 mm on 9 Oct.
This area had burned before
66% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,662 ha in 2016, 1,084 ha in 2017, 1,463 ha in 2018, 16,861 ha in 2020, 16,489 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 23,211 ha that had burned before.
- 14,101 ha Magdalena fire, September 2020 30,494 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,919 ha Magdalena fire, October 2021 5,295 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,811 ha Baures fire, September 2021 4,670 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,544 ha Magdalena fire, September 2021 25,480 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 126 ha Baures fire, October 2021 7,023 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 88 ha Baures fire, October 2021 4,951 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 20 ha Magdalena fire, September 2021 23,784 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Baures 7,488 inhabitants29,259 ha reached on 19 Sept1.6 %
-
6,255 ha reached on 15 Sept0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there were about 0.21 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept | 27.1 °C | 36 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 16 Sept | 31.8 °C | 39 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 17 Sept | 34.9 °C | 37 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 18 Sept | 35.9 °C | 37 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 19 Sept | 35.4 °C | 44 % | 34 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 26 |
| 20 Sept | 35.9 °C | 43 % | 36 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 28 |
| 21 Sept | 36.5 °C | 38 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 22 Sept | 32.6 °C | 51 % | 34 km/h | 2.6 mm | Low 11 |
| 23 Sept | 27.7 °C | 54 % | 35 km/h | 2.3 mm | Low 8 |
| 24 Sept | 34.2 °C | 38 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 25 Sept | 36.0 °C | 39 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 26 Sept | 35.9 °C | 42 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 27 Sept | 35.7 °C | 43 % | 35 km/h | 0.7 mm | High 24 |
| 28 Sept | 33.9 °C | 47 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 23 |
| 29 Sept | 27.1 °C | 62 % | 42 km/h | 13.4 mm | Very low 2 |
| 30 Sept | 29.4 °C | 54 % | 31 km/h | 0.5 mm | Low 6 |
| 1 Oct | 33.5 °C | 45 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 2 Oct | 34.0 °C | 46 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 3 Oct | 34.6 °C | 48 % | 27 km/h | 1.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 4 Oct | 34.8 °C | 47 % | 27 km/h | 5.3 mm | Very low 5 |
| 5 Oct | 34.4 °C | 46 % | 39 km/h | 0.1 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 6 Oct | 34.6 °C | 44 % | 38 km/h | 3.4 mm | Low 7 |
| 7 Oct | 26.5 °C | 82 % | 35 km/h | 9.5 mm | Very low 0 |
| 8 Oct after | 33.6 °C | 51 % | 37 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very low 2 |
| 9 Oct after | 33.5 °C | 54 % | 26 km/h | 4.8 mm | Very low 1 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 1 October 2022 the air beside the fire reached 426 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 212: 14 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1,964Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 30,494 haMagdalena28 September 2020 · 26 days · 6 km away
- 30,869 haBaures24 October 2023 · 27 days · 11 km away
- 23,784 haMagdalena13 September 2021 · 22 days · 20 km away
- 21,879 haMagdalena8 October 2025 · 19 days · 20 km away
- 25,480 haMagdalena18 September 2021 · 17 days · 23 km away
- 32,085 haBaures12 August 2024 · 29 days · 25 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Magdalena fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 15 September 2022 to 7 October 2022 (23 days). The perimeter dates it from 17 September 2022 to 7 October 2022.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 35,295 hectares (353.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Baures (29,259 ha, 1.6 %); Magdalena (6,255 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.5 °C, humidity dropped to 36 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Bolivia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 119 · 110 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 17 September 2022 to 7 October 2022. 1,964 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.